I’ve already had one person attempt this assignment.The question were not correctly answered. There were many grammatical and spelling errors, too. Please do not attempt this assignment if you cannot meet the word count or correctly complete the assignment. I really need help and I need someone to do it right. Thank you!

There are 6 discussion questions. With a 150 word minimum.

Lesson 3 In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· After reading the Gill essay, Discuss the logical point made by some opponents of PAS that it is impossible to be better off dead than alive. Even if the logical argument were sound, are there other reasons to claim that suicide for a terminally ill patient is morally justified?

· What worries does Velleman raise about appeals to dignity and autonomy in arguments over euthanasia? Do you agree or disagree with him on this issue? Why or why not?

Lesson 4 In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Leopold suggests that economics should not be our only concern when it comes to the use of land. To what extent should economic considerations play a part in our treatment of nature and the environment?

· Are there any situations in which economic concerns might trump environmental ones? If so, could you give an example?

Lesson 5 In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Do you relate more to the abolitionist or the retentionist position?

· What do you see as the two strongest supporting arguments for your position, and why?

Lesson 6 In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to the following questions:

· Prior to reading the text, how would you have defined terrorism?

· What is your understanding of terrorism now?

· How would you account for the huge amount of terrorism in the 20th and 21st centuries?

· What do you see as the ethically proper response to acts of terror?

Lesson 7 In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· What do people spend money on that they either don’t need or rarely use other than those things mentioned by Singer? What things might people be most easily convinced to do without, and why?

· Consider and discuss whether the Kantian argument for helping the vulnerable is more or less convincing than the traditional utilitarian arguments. What kinds of arguments would be the most likely to persuade people to help those in need?

· Does Peter Singer’s greatest moral evil rule require that persons act in heroic ways or go above and beyond the call of duty as Arthur suggests? Explain your answer.

Lesson 8 In a paragraph (150 word minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:

· Macedo distinguishes two possible ways, which he labels “humanitarian assistance” and “distributive justice,” of seeking to improve the condition of the poor. Explain these two approaches to assisting the poor. Do you agree or disagree with them? Why or why not?

· Why does Macedo claim that cosmopolitan distributive justice “makes no sense”? Do you agree or disagree with him on this question?

answer the below question 200 word min.  Due tomorrow by 5 pm est.

1.How did the spirit of Manifest Destiny and federal policies guide the outcome of Native American tribes on the Great Plains and west of the Great Plains?   2.How do you think immigration policies today facilitate immigration to the United States?  References  History. (2018a). Manifest destiny. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/westward-expansion/manifest-destiny  History. (2018b). Native American cultures. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/native-american-history/native-american-cultures  Khan Academy. (2018). Manifest destiny. Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-4/apush-age-of-jackson/a/manifest-destiny

Make sure to read my part 1 info then do the part 2 assignment. 4 pages. 

Write a 150-250 word post response tot his prompt:  Focusing on Grego or Vann, discuss how the author uses attention to race to illuminate specific elements of the disaster they’re examining.  (Alternatively, you may create your own prompt related to the readings and respond to it.  If you choose this option, provide your prompt at the top.)

Add one question about something that confused you in the readings, or one they left unanswered that you’re curious about, or one you’d like to hear others’ opinions on.