WK8

/in /by

Be sure to provide 5 APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

Please be sure to follow EACH AND EVERY BULLET POINT.

Make sure to ANSWER EACH QUESTION ACCURATELY.

(TOPIC: In Attachment**)

***Please be sure to include all information from the attachment in the assignment*****

Please use the template attached to complete the assignment.

*****PLEASE VIEW THE VIDEO, FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES ATTACHED, AND CRITIQUE THE ATTACHED *********

USE TEMPLATE ATTACHED*****

P1   https://video.alexanderstreet.com/embed/training-title-114-2/clips/178610

P2   https://video.alexanderstreet.com/embed/training-title-114-2/clips/178611

P3   https://video.alexanderstreet.com/embed/training-title-114-2/clips/178612

P4   https://video.alexanderstreet.com/embed/training-title-114-2/clips/178613

Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease

/in /by

 

Discuss the safety and effectiveness of alternative and complementary medicine for the treatment of specific

illnesses such as cancer, diabetes, and hypertension.  Share your opinions about holistic and allopathic care.

Would have any conflicts or concerns supporting a patient who chooses holistic or allopathic medicine?

Instructions: 

Post your discussion to the Moodle Discussion Forum.  Initial post must be made by Day #3.  Word limit 500 words.  Reply to at least two other student posts with a reflection of their response.  Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.

question

/in /by


Back to Module at a Glance

ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 3: RESEARCH ANALYSIS

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.

In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

RESOURCES


Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

· Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017).
Critical appraisal of clinical research
Links to an external site.
.
 Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942

· Shellenbarger, T. (2016). 
Simplifying synthesis
Links to an external site.
. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/ 

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 
Databases A-Z: Nursing
Links to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 
Evaluating resources: Journals
Links to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

· Walden University Library. (n.d.). 
Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research
Links to an external site.
. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals

·
Walden University Writing Center.
Links to an external site.
 (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 
Common assignments: Synthesizing your sources
Links to an external site.
. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesizing

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 
Scholarly writing: Overview
Links to an external site.
. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly

· Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). 
Webinars: Technical information
Links to an external site.
. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical

· Document: 
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template
 Download Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template(Word document)

· Document: 
Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success
 Download Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success(PDF)

To Prepare:

·
Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module's Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.

·
Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.

·
Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of your 
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

·
Your topic of interest.

·
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

·
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

·
Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template

·
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.

·
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

·
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

·
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

·
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.


Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the 
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

1.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2.
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.


Rubric

NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsing the Week 3 Part 3, section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template complete Step 1. Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· The topic of interest you have selected. · Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details. · Identify one or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details. … The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details. … The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template for:Strengths of the ResearchLimitations of the ResearchRelevancy to the Topic of Interest. · Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3, Step 2: Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: · Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. · Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response partially identifies and describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research or is missing. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail or is missing at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

MSN 5300 week 2

/in /by

 

Discuss the differences and similarities between quantitative, qualitative and mix methods research studies. 

Please include 400 words .Attached you can find the rubric to follow up

Case Study 3

/in /by

 Pagana: Mosby’s Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, 6th Edition Adolescent With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Case Studies The patient, a 16-year-old high-school football player, was brought to the emergency room in a coma. His mother said that during the past month he had lost 12 pounds and experienced excessive thirst associated with voluminous urination that often required voiding several times during the night. There was a strong family history of diabetes mellitus (DM). The results of physical examination were essentially negative except for sinus tachycardia and Kussmaul respirations. Studies Results Serum glucose test (on admission), p. 227 1100 mg/dL (normal: 60–120 mg/dL) Arterial blood gases (ABGs) test (on admission), p. 98 pH 7.23 (normal: 7.35–7.45) PCO2 30 mm Hg (normal: 35–45 mm Hg) HCO2 12 mEq/L (normal: 22–26 mEq/L) Serum osmolality test, p. 339 440 mOsm/kg (normal: 275–300 mOsm/kg) Serum glucose test, p. 227 250 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 2-hour postprandial glucose test (2-hour PPG), p. 230 500 mg/dL (normal: <140 mg/dL) Glucose tolerance test (GTT), p. 234 Fasting blood glucose 150 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 30 minutes 300 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL) 1 hour 325 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL) 2 hours 390 mg/dL (normal: <140 mg/dL) 3 hours 300 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 4 hours 260 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) Glycosylated hemoglobin, p. 238 9% (normal: <7%) Diabetes mellitus autoantibody panel, p. 186 insulin autoantibody Positive titer >1/80 islet cell antibody Positive titer >1/120 glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody Positive titer >1/60 Microalbumin, p. 872 <20 mg/L Diagnostic Analysis The patient’s symptoms and diagnostic studies were classic for hyperglycemic ketoacidosis associated with DM. The glycosylated hemoglobin showed that he had been hyperglycemic over the last several months. The results of his arterial blood gases (ABGs) test on admission indicated metabolic acidosis with some respiratory compensation. He was treated in the Case Studies Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2 emergency room with IV regular insulin and IV fluids; however, before he received any insulin levels, insulin antibodies were obtained and were positive, indicating a degree of insulin resistance. His microalbumin was normal, indicating no evidence of diabetic renal disease, often a late complication of diabetes. During the first 72 hours of hospitalization, the patient was monitored with frequent serum glucose determinations. Insulin was administered according to the results of these studies. His condition was eventually stabilized on 40 units of Humulin N insulin daily. He was converted to an insulin pump and did very well with that. Comprehensive patient instruction regarding selfblood glucose monitoring, insulin administration, diet, exercise, foot care, and recognition of the signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia was given. Critical Thinking Questions 1. Why was this patient in metabolic acidosis? 2. Do you think the patient will eventually be switched to an oral hypoglycemic agent? 3. How would you anticipate this life changing diagnosis is going to affect your patient according to his age and sex? 4. The parents of your patient seem to be confused and not knowing what to do with this diagnoses. What would you recommend to them? 

w8

/in /by

In 2–3 pages, plus introduction and references pages.APA format and free plagiarism

Submit your Assignment. Attach copies of or links to the suicide and violence risk assessments you selected.

· Explain your state laws (FLORIDA) for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released.

· Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state.

· Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts.

· Select one of the following topics, and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source.( choose the one you want.)

· Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.

· Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.

NURSING nursing

/in /by

Medication Errors

Discussion

/in /by

 Respond at least 2 times each The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to 1 of the 3 discussion prompts that your colleagues provided in their video presentations. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient. 

Oncologic emergencies

/in /by

 

Instructions

Read the article, “Oncologic emergencies in a cancer center emergency department and in general emergency departments countywide and nationwide”.  You may access the article in the resource folder. 

Thoroughly review the complete research article exploring the management of oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED). Focus on patient characteristics, diagnoses, and factors influencing hospitalization.

Your case study should demonstrate a thorough grasp of the entire article, using specific details to support your points. This assignment aims to assess your ability to distill complex medical information into a focused case study, highlighting essential strategies for managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients. 

Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

Case Study Focus:

Based on your comprehensive reading, create a Case study highlighting key strategies for effectively managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.

Key Points

Resource Optimization: Explain how increased resource utilization and hospitalization rates among cancer patients impact healthcare delivery. Discuss strategies to optimize resources while maintaining high quality care.

Timely Diagnosis: Emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention. Provide examples from the article illustrating the benefits of early recognition and swift treatment.

Tailored Interventions: Explore the concept of tailoring treatments to individual oncologic conditions. Share insights on customizing interventions based on diagnoses outlined in the article.

Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Discuss the value of multidisciplinary collaboration in managing critically ill patients. Describe how different specialties can work together for comprehensive patient care.

Risk Stratification: Explain the role of risk assessment in identifying high-risk patients and the significance of early interventions to prevent complications.

Education and Training: Address the impact of education and training on enhancing oncologic emergencies management. Highlight the benefits of well informed healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Summarize key insights from the article and emphasize the patient centered approach to managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.

Week 6 – Discussion

/in /by

HUM 1050 – Introduction to Literature

Week 6 – Discussion

Instructions:

This week, we shift our discussion to poetry, focusing on the work of Martin Espada. You will upload a PowerPoint in the discussion and in the Dropbox for grading that includes a visual that interprets one of his poems. Choose a poem from the link below:

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/martin-espada

Your presentation should be a minimum of six slides and may have more depending on the length of the poem. Here is a suggested layout:

· Slide 1: Include the title of the presentation and your name, college name, course name, instructor name, date

· Slide 2: Include a brief bio of the poet.

· Slide 3: Introduce the poem with a link to the poem.

· Slides 4-5: Present the visual you have selected. Give the background on the visual and explain its relevance to the poem.

· Slide 6: Reference list in APA format. 

 

Criteria

Ratings

The Poem

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Focus on poem

CSLO 3

threshold: 15.0 pts

15 pts

Mastery

15 pts The poem presented clearly on the slide(s)

The VIsual

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Visual presented

CSLO 3

threshold: 15.0 pts

15 pts

Mastery

15 pts A vivid image that interprets the poem clearly presented

Theme of poem

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Theme of poem

CSLO 4

threshold: 20.0 pts

20 pts

Mastery

20 pts The theme of the poem clearly presented

Author's Biography

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Author’s biography

CSLO 4

threshold: 20.0 pts

10 pts

Mastery

10 pts Poet’s biography clearly presented

Formatting and Readability

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Formatting and readability

CSLO 6

threshold: 10.0 pts

20 pts

Mastery

20 pts Text and layout are clear and easy to

APA Formatting

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA formatting

CSLO 5

threshold: 10.0 pts

10 pts

Mastery

10 pts Citations and References are properly presented

Language

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Language is appropriate

CSLO 6

threshold: 10.0 pts

10 pts

Mastery

10 pts Fewer than 3 grammatical, punctuation, or mechanical errors