Discussion Social Factors (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to identify community data that impacts social factors of health.

Preparing the Assignment

· Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

· Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

· Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

· Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

· Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

· Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

· Best Practices include:

· Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

· Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

· Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

There are many factors that make people healthy or ill.  This week we will focus on the social factors and determinants that impact health.

It is time to get out into your community!

· Go online to the U.S. Census Bureau at 

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ Links to an external site.
(*note, you will be using this website in the Week 2 assignment, so you can get started on collecting all the required data if desired)

· Input your local zip code, city, or county. Try to get as specific data as possible (city, township, county).

· Next, identify the:

· Total population

· Median income

· Percentage or number of persons living in poverty

· Go to your local grocery store, use a flyer, or app. Include the stores name, city, and state. Identify cost for the following items (please note whether items are organic):

· 1 gallon of milk

· 1 loaf of bread

· 1 bag of apples (include price per pound)

· 1 bag of carrots

· 1 large container of yogurt

· 1 2-liter of soda

· 1 bag of chips

· 1 package of cookies

· Utilizing the data collected, discuss social factors that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.).

· Discuss how a community health nurse (CHN) could use one of the 17 intervention categories from the Public Health Intervention Wheel to address areas of food security (Nies & McEwen, 2019).

· In your responses to classmates, include comparisons and contrasting information.

Your discussion post should look like:

· Paragraph one: Utilizing the data collected, discuss a social factor that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.)

· Paragraph two: Utilizing the data collected, discuss 
another social factor that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.)

· Paragraph three: Discuss how a community health nurse (CHN) could use one of the 17 intervention categories from the Public Health Intervention Wheel to address areas of food security

· Resources: Where did you find your data?

EBOOK used: Community/Public Health Nursing
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780323528948/epubcfi/6/2%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dhtml-cover-page%5D!/4/2/4%4050:79

OR

Email:
[email protected]

PWD: Bryanthierry@09

 

• Differentiate between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research methodologies 
• Analyze the relationship between peer-reviewed articles and clinical issues
• Analyze research ethics related to clinical issues and peer-reviewed research
• Analyze the aims of research studies presented in peer-reviewed articles
• Analyze research methodologies described in peer-reviewed articles
• Analyze strengths, reliability, and validity of research methodologies in peer-reviewed research

References: 

 Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

• Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 37–60)
• Chapter 22, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 731–776)
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries JournalLinks to an external site., 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
• Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing StandardLinks to an external site., 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

see below

Please see the attachment for instructions