Please see the attachment for the instructions

Module 01 Written Assignment – Compare and Contrast Two Mental Health Theories

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Module 01 Content

1.

Top of Form

Submit a paper which compares and contrasts two mental health theories:

· You may choose your theories from the textbook or from other sources.

· Describe each theory, including some history about the person who developed the theory and the major ideas and applications of the theory.

· Describe the ways in which the two theories are similar, and how they differ.

· Include a statement of how each theory could be used in your nursing practice. Include specific patient examples if you have them. You may also critique the theory: Is there anything with which you disagree or are there any problems you can identify?

· It is expected that this essay will be 2-3 pages in length (not including the title page), double-spaced. Your paper should include an introduction and conclusion and proper APA citations from any source material you use, including your text.

2. NOTE :

3. APA, CITATION, AND REFERENCING

4. Strictly PLAGIARISM-CHECK Bottom of Form

Week 3 – Assignment: Individualize the Role of Stakeholders' Contribution to Healthcare Quality Performance Measures

As a leader in the healthcare field, the assurance of delivering quality health care will remain an important aspect of your work. To understand the organization's performance and its impact on clinical quality and financial stability, in this week's assignment, you will examine and interpret performance measures using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results as they relate to patient satisfaction and promote stakeholder confidence in the organization.

There are multiple factors that contribute to healthcare quality and financial stability including the actions of key healthcare stakeholders. Begin your assignment by taking the following steps: 

1. Download the table below from your Weekly Resources to draft the contribution each stakeholder has in healthcare quality and the financial impact on the organization through your research. In the table, write a synopsis of 150-250 words for each stakeholder as it relates to their role. Remember Deming's words that quality is the responsibility of everyone. Be sure to include in your discussion the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction survey when you are completing your table.    

2. Once you have completed your table, you will use either
Kaltura Capture to create a videotaped PowerPoint presentation or create a voice-over PowerPoint presentation (with speaker notes)  using the information contained in your table. Each stakeholder will be on a separate slide and your 150-250 synopsis on each stakeholder from your table will be placed in the Speaker Notes on each slide. If you do not wish to be video-taped, you may use the audio recorder in the PowerPoint program instead of
Kaltura Capture.  
( I GOT THE VIDEO AUDIO PORTION)

Your role in your PowerPoint presentation is that of a hospital health administrator who is briefing your hospital board of trustees on the contribution of each stakeholder in assuring quality measures and financial stability in your hospital.  

	Stakeholders	Contribution to Quality Clinical Measures,  Outcomes, and/or Financial Status
1	Patients
2	Clinical providers (physicians, nurses, therapists, etc.)
3	Health administrators
4	Hospital Board of Trustees
	Hospital Regulatory agencies
6	Insurers (private, public governmental)
7	Medical supply/equipment manufacturers
8	Supply chain vendors
9	Educational partners (faculty, students)
10	Community at Large

Length: A minimum of 10 slides in your Voice-Over PowerPoint presentation, not including the title slide and reference slide. Each slide will depict a single stakeholder and will have 150-250-word synopsis in the Speaker Notes.

Include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed resources. Other scholarly and credible sources may also be used as supplemental support.

Please discuss the importance of USPSTF Screening Recommendations in Primary Care. 

Please include 400 words in your initial post and 200 words in your answers to your peers. The initial post is due Wednesday at midnight and the answers to your peers Saturday at 23:59pm.

Examine 
Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD

Case Study: 
A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD
Links to an external site.

You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.

Introduction to the case (1 page)

· Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1 page)

· Which decision did you select?

· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).

· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #2 (1 page)

· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).

· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #3 (1 page)

· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).

· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Conclusion (1 page)

· Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

· Stahl, S. M. (2021). 
Stahl's essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th Ed.) Cambridge University Press.

· Chapter 11, “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Its Treatment” (pp. 449-485)

· American Psychiatric Association. (2022). 


Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

Links to an external site.
 (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

· Hodgkins, P., Shaw, M., McCarthy, S., & Sallee, F. R. (2012). The pharmacology and clinical outcomes of amphetamines to treat ADHD: Does composition matter? 


CNS DrugsLinks to an external site.


, 26(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.2165/11599630-000000000-00000