Replies week 4 MSN5300

 Please include a 200 words in two answers to peers 

 

1.The economic and human costs associated with Alzheimer’s disease have prompted various research studies into the matter. A key topic of research and evaluation is the family’s role or obligation in caring for Alzheimer’s patients, especially parents. Such studies need to incorporate ethical considerations as they involve human beings, sensitive and vulnerable medical and care information, and contribute to knowledge development of the matter; thus, they should be done in the right way to improve the credibility and reliability of the information in the research. Ethical considerations are guidelines and principles that guide research and ensure the research process does not violate any human rights or academic regulations.

Martinez et al. (2022) conducted a qualitative study to understand the dynamics of caregiving of patients with Alzheimer’s within the Latino community because of their emphasis on familism. The study conducted interviews as its primary data collection method, which mandated various ethical considerations. Therefore, Martinez et al. obtained approval from their university’s Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained before the interview. In another study to understand the caregiver’s perception of the unmet palliative care needs in Iranian Alzheimer’s patients, Ashrafizadeh et al. (2021) conducted a qualitative study. In this study, the authors mention that they incorporated various ethical considerations, including approval by the respective university’s Ethics committee. Additionally, they incorporated the voluntary nature of participation, obtained informed written consent forms and anonymity of the participants, and informed them of their right to withdraw from the study at any point. Further, they ensured the confidentiality of the information provided by the participants and guaranteed of using the said information for the sole purpose of the research.

In a cross-sectional study that involved fifty formal caregivers and fifty informal caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients, Sołtys & Tyburski (2020) sought to understand the predictors of mental health problems among these caregivers. The authors ensured that all surveyed caregivers willingly agreed to participate, and an ethics committee approved the study. Also, participants provided informed consent. Ashrafizadeh et al. (2021) ethical approach was relatively different, as the key ethical considerations were approval and the participant’s rights. This is seen in how the study guaranteed anonymity by providing nicknames for the participants that also assured confidentiality of the information provided. The participants were also assured of the publication of the results. At the same time, the authors obtained both oral and written consent to ensure the participants understood their involvement, including their right to withdraw from the study. Ethical considerations are similar as long as they involve human participants, even through virtual communication. Rodríguez-Mora et al conducted their interviews virtually but also had to seek informed consent and approval, and in this case, ensure no harm came to the participants by upholding the containment measures as the study was conducted during the recent pandemic.

2. Ethical approaches in research studies entail setting principles that help achieve the goal of research designs and practices. The approaches help the researchers to achieve a code of conduct when interacting with people to collect data. The primary goals of any short or comprehensive research entail enhancing the research validity, maintaining scientific or academic integrity, and acknowledging researchers who performed various research earlier. These practices are mainly for the research conducted using printed or recorded data sources.

Human research entails comprehensive ethical considerations, with voluntary participation being one of them. There is no pressure or compulsion used on any research participants to participate. Everyone enrolled in the study can stop at any time without feeling obligated to continue (Newman et al., 2021). Participants cannot be coerced into justifying leaving the study. As a result, it is critical to make it evident to participants that declining to participate will not have any detrimental effects.

Another consideration is whether participants provided informed consent and where the data was collected. The prospective participants should be provided with and comprehend the information necessary for making a participation decision (Newman et al., 2021). This includes information about the study’s advantages, hazards, funding, and institutional endorsement. Participants should be given a text to read and asked if they have any questions before proceeding. They can initial or sign the consent form if they are willing to participate. When working with particularly vulnerable groups of people, remember that this might not be enough to obtain informed consent.

Further confidentiality must be integrated into research by granting all participants the right to privacy. The researchers must protect participants’ data for a long provided they hold it (Horton & Lucassen, 2023). this consideration should be maintained when the data is collected anonymously. Assumptions such as research process grant confidentiality automatically grants confidentiality should not be taken (Horton & Lucassen, 2023). Some research designs are not conducive to confidentiality, but it is essential to make all attempts and inform participants of the risks involved. Therefore, achieving confidentiality should be explicitly planned for and met by the researchers.

In conclusion, ethical approaches to conducting research should entail observing a code of conduct that enhances research validity when collecting, storing, and interpreting data. Academic integrity should be considered when dealing with records. In human research, participants should be allowed to provide data voluntarily. They should be informed of the research details before being subjected to the research participation. Confidentiality of personal information should be significantly upheld even when research designs do not appear to favor confidentiality. Thus, researchers must ensure that research validity is enhanced by taking the ideal measures of research ethics.

Nutritional analysis

Part 1: Healthy Body WeightExamining your energy balance and factors that affect your appetite.

Part 2: Breaking Bad HabitsExamining your unhealthy eating behaviors and developing a plan to break them.

Part 3: Physical ActivityExamining your level of fitness and developing a plan to increase it.

SummarySummarizing your plan for gaining or maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

To receive full credit, all answers must be typed and in complete sentences to receive full credit. You will be graded for detail and specific information. Provide details that demonstrate your knowledge of nutrition and a healthy lifestyle. Listing, bulleting, or short answers are not acceptable.

Remember to use full sentences and paragraphs when answering all parts. A well-formed paragraph consists of at least three proper sentences. A proper sentence is a complete idea and consists of at least one noun and one verb.

Research Question

Topic: Atherosclerosis

-etiology, clinical manifestations, evaluation, and treatment.

-potential for heart disease and stroke.

at least two sources and masters level terminology

two pages. 

W3 Self assesment

please follow all directions

Research Table (Healthcare)

Due 10/4   5 pm EST

Please Follow instructions. attach article

 

Assessment 4 4050

Assessment 4

Final Care Coordination Plan

INTRODUCTION- For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

INTRODUCTION-This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.

PREPARATION- You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of 
Healthy People 2030.

INSTRUCTIONS- Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.

For this assessment:

· Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.

Document Format and Length

Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

Supporting Evidence

Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Address three health care issues.

· Design an intervention for each health issue.

· Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.

· Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Cite specific health policy provisions.

· Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

· Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.

· Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Additional Requirements-Before submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.

Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.

Context- Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.

Course Competencies- By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.

· Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

· Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide

CRITERIA

NON-PERFORMANCE

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Career concept map format

please see attached

Nursing Assignment, NO PLAGARISM

Midterm Paper Information

Your midterm paper will focus on healthcare fraud & abuse.  Unfortunately, there is an abundance of unsavory activities in the industry leading to a significant cost to the public.  A variety of regulatory agencies conduct investigations that can lead to significant penalty including monetary, recovery of funds, civil and criminal prosecution.  When cases are finalized, results determined, information is public.

Use the internet to search for cases.  Examples include oig.gov, civil monetary penalties, federal false claims act, Stark violations, anti kickback statute, qui tam (whistleblower) cases, healthcare fraud & abuse.  Select one or several cases.  Develop your paper 8-10 pages, double spaced, 12-14 font.  Include works cited for direct quotes.  Include the case specifics, what triggered the investigation & outcome.  At the end of your paper, discuss how you would approach a situation in your workplace in which you are suspicious of fraudulent activity.

Due October 14

discussion

 

  1. After studying the lesson “Nursing Leadership” in Chapter 21 of the textbook (eBook), open a discussion forum by answering the following questions:
  2. What is leadership?
  3. What is a leader?
  4. How does a nurse demonstrate leadership characteristics? Explain.
  5. Do you think Florence Nightingale was a leader in the nursing profession? Why?          Explain.
  6. Describe the following types of leadership: autocratic, democratic, and Laissez-Faire. Give an example of each one within the nursing field.
  7. This topic will be part of class discussion this week (Module 7).
  8. In addition to the eBook, you are required to use at least two more primary references.
  9. Remember APA style when use references “in-text” citation and in the References at the final of your publication.
  10. Submission Instructions:
  • Submit your discussion post by 5:59 PM Eastern on Thursday, October 5th, 2023. 
  • Your initial post should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
  • Respond to your classmates’ discussion posts by 11:59 PM Eastern on Saturday, October 7th, 2023. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.