Requesting writing tutor

HED

HED

In the article The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity [PDF], the authors focus on the need for health equity in the U.S. and the World through:

Identification of Disparities

Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Disparities

Investing in Equity Measurement

Incentivizing the Achievement of Equity

In 250 to 300 words discuss the addition of health equity to complete the Quintuple Aim and outline how you will integrate the recommendations to achieve health equity into the organization if you were the CEO.

Discussion 250 words. Make sure you provide 2 references and utilize APA style.. . Discussion Rubric

Discussion Topic

Top of Form

This week our readings took us into Specific Aspects of Health Promotion for the following conditions: Weight Management and Digestive Wellness, Cardiovascular Wellness, and Respiratory Wellness.

Imagine you are leading a focus group which is implementing one of the nursing interventions learned for a specific health problem. 

Having you as a moderator of a community focus group that will explore knowledge, believes, attitudes and behaviors about your selected health problem [you may select any health problem]:

1.
Define your group and the setting for the activity, applying statistical principles of sample size and homogeneity.

2.
Create and share an opening question to explore perceptions of the health risks associated with your topic of interest.

3.
Create a question that should explore beliefs and perceptions about external influences related to your selected topic.

4.
Create a third question that will help you in understanding the perception (in group members) of roles towards improving the health problem.

Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359.

Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 250 words, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.

Bottom of Form

Unit 9 ADHD Medications. 800w. 4 references. Due 10-26-23

Unit 9 ADHD Medications. 800w. 4 references. Due 10-26-23

Thomas Deliver, a 36-year-old male patient, enters your office for his initial appointment.  According to the intake paperwork, Mr. Deliver is a computer programmer who is complaining of problems with concentration, completing tasks, and being terrible at listening during company meetings and even at home.  He explains that he has difficulty starting and completing work projects and trouble being on time or keeping appointments and commitments.  He has divorced 3 months ago and has joint custody of two daughters ages 6 and 10 years old.  On most days, he sleeps late and he has trouble keeping a regular schedule and getting his children to their lessons and extracurricular appointments on time. 

Mr. Deliver believes the lack of concentration and poor communication with his wife led to the divorce, and Mr. Deliver worries that his trouble with organization and attention may affect his custody agreement and prevent him from keeping his job. 

Mr. Deliver’s employer and his family and friends have suggested to him that he should get evaluated for ADHD, but he has resisted because of concerns about the stigma of a psychiatric diagnosis and the risks of taking a psychotropic medication.

Mr. Deliver is 5'11″ and his weight is 165 lb.  He takes a men’s multivitamin daily, HCTZ at 25 mg for hypertension, fish oil 1,000 mg at bedtime for hyperlipidemia, and a rescue inhaler that he keeps with him although he hasn’t had to use it for many years.

1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?

2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?

Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age).  How will your pharmacological treatment change?

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.

1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver

meets the criteria for ADHD?

 The first tool I would use to affirm that this patient meets the criteria for ADHD would be

the DSM-5. The DSM-5 lists the diagnostic criteria for ADHD as needing six or more of

the symptoms in either category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and

impulsivity) that last for at least 6 months and to a degree that negatively impacts social,

academic or occupations activities. These symptoms also need to be present in two or

more settings, be present prior to age of 12 years and do not occur exclusively during

the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder and are not better explained

by another mental disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). There are also

many screening tools to use in addition to the DSM-5. Rating scales are used in

conjunction with the DSM-5 to help with diagnosis of ADHD. Rating scales specifically

designed for use in adults include: Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom

Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS); Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS);

ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV); and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).

This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/

2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD,

inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological

treatment for Mr. Deliver?

I would recommend either an amphetamine or methylphenidate. I am slightly

concerned about this patient’s history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, as both

of these psychostimulant classes have been shown to raise blood pressure. Long

term studies have shown that stimulant use is not associated with increased risk of

heart attacks, cardiac death or stroke. Those with well-controlled hypertension have

been shown to manage ADHD symptoms effectively with amphetamines and

methylphenidates. This still does not negate the fact however, that the product

labels of stimulants state that “caution is indicated” when treating patients with preexisting hypertension (Fairman et al., 2018). I would also be sure to encourage this

patient to partake in behavioral therapy as well as using prescription medication.

3. Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male

that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on

any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?

For an adolescent patient the treatment plan is not a lot different than for adults

with ADHD. Stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, but there can be a

risk for growth restriction. There are other non-stimulant medications that could be

tried first (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). As with

adults with ADHD, I would also recommend concurrent behavioral therapy (Heldt,

2017).

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

(5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing

Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of

Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD

with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real

World Outcomes, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2

This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/

Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry

(Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44–53.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/

Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing

Platform

1.What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?

The DSM-5 would be the first resource I would consult to confirm if this patient satisfies the requirements for ADHD. According to the DSM-5, six or more symptoms from either group—category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and impulsivity)—must be present for at least six months and have a detrimental influence on a person's ability to engage in social, academic, or occupational activities. Additionally, these symptoms must appear in two or more contexts, appear before the age of twelve, not only occasionally during the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic condition, and not be better explained by another mental illness (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).The DSM-5 is just one of several screening instruments available. The DSM-5 and rating scales are combined to assist in the diagnosis of ADHD. The Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS), the Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS), the ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV), and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) are among the rating scales created expressly for use in adults (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).

 

 

2.Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?

 

Either an amphetamine or methylphenidate is what I would advise. The patient's history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia causes me a little anxiety because it has been demonstrated that both of these kinds of psychostimulants can increase blood pressure. Studies conducted over an extended period of time have revealed no link between stimulant usage and an increased risk of heart attacks, cardiac death, or stroke. Amphetamines and methylphenidate have been demonstrated to help people with well-controlled hypertension manage their ADHD symptoms. However, this does not change the fact that while treating patients with preexisting hypertension, caution is advised on the product labels of stimulants (Fairman et al., 2018). In addition to prescription medication, I would make sure to encourage this patient to engage in behavioral treatment.

 

3.Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?

The treatment strategy is mostly the same for adolescents and adults with ADHD. Although stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, there is a chance that they may limit growth. There are more non-stimulant drugs that might be tried initially (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). In the same way that I would advise concurrent behavioral therapy for people with ADHD (Heldt, 2017)

Step-by-step explanation

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing

 

 Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real World Outcomes, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2

 

Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/ 

 

Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. 

POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

See attachment for instructions 

wk4691B

1

This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your

previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If

you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next

writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write

about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If

you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One

week for this job.

Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your

previous writings.

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933

Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

2

This week, you will bring together all of the assignments you have completed thus far,
and compose the rough draft of your change project paper. At this point, you will have
submitted each section and received feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident. 
Your rough draft contains all of the expected
components of the final draft and is presented in APA format including a cover page,
references, and appendices when warranted. Your rough draft is your opportunity to
polish previously submitted assignments and combine the sections in a comprehensive
paper that show your change project is ready to be implemented.

You will take this time to identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in your change

project. Your rough draft should only require minor revisions before the final paper.

Your paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,

references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and

format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (rough draft)

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper

Rubic (rough draft)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The change project topic is introduced. All

background information is included. Project

importance within the field or significance

for the designated facility is described.

3.5
pts

3

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the

chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem

thoroughly, including the target population

description and history/background information

at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance

and applicability to nursing is included and well

presented. Includes an appropriate topic

identification related to an advanced practice

nursing issue or practice problem of concern.

Population is fully defined and present in the

research question. Includes specific interventions,

identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate

outcomes in a timely manner for the question.

Overall, the question is well-built using the PICOT

format.

3.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed

articles, books, or limited non-research literature

(tool kits or standardized procedures) are present.

Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is

credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support

the main topic. In-text citations are present and

correctly formatted. Presents a thorough and

insightful analysis of significant findings related to

the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and

professionally sound and creative. Insightful and

comprehensive conclusions and solutions are

present.

3.5
pts

4

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are

well-developed. They are clear and thorough. Aims

include examples of projected features and

functions. Values include implementation benefits

for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes state the

purpose, have a quality focus, and describe the

benefits that will occur as a result of

implementation.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies independent theories or conceptual models

that relate to the change project topic and describes

how they will be applied to the change project.

Thoroughly discusses how each element of the

phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly

applies each element of the theory to the elements

of the phenomenon under study. Develops the

rationale for the sample selection criteria, and

expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent

research that uses the framework.

7 pts

5

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides keen insight into obstacles and proposes

sound, creative solutions or interventions based on

the literature review findings. Expertly compares

other views on the problem and solutions with detail.

Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in

the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its significance

to the nursing profession and filling gaps in

knowledge. Accurately categorizes and thoroughly

explains specific methods of data collection to be

used. Explains in detail how data will be analyzed and

used. Provides a sound justification for subject

selection and sampling procedure. Accurately and

thoroughly describes potential limitations to data

collection and control.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an insightful and thorough summary of the

project, main points, and details the significance of

the project to the advanced practice nursing

profession. Provides detailed and creative

recommendations for future research and

implications for clinical practice. Discusses limitations

of the study in detail. Suggests specific directions for

future research. Insightfully considers changes in

theoretical construct and provides reasonable and

creative suggestions for public policy and/or changes

in educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical

framework to the overall product.

10.5
pts

6

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Rough
Draft

17.5 to >14.35 pts

Meets Expectations

Submission shows a concerted effort to present a

high-quality draft requiring minimal adjustments to

content and mechanics. All parts of the research

paper are submitted and efforts to integrate

feedback are highly apparent. Significant and

substantive improvements have been made to each

section of the paper.

17.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.

Information is well organized and clearly

communicated. The assignment is free of spelling and

grammatical errors. All the requirements related to

format, length, source citations, and layout are

followed. A complete reference page is included and

formatted using correct APA format. If applicable,

appendices and tables are complete and

appropriate.The

10.5
pts

Total Points: 70

7

  • Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

D. Saa Critical Care Wk 3 Disc

MY NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 3 WHICH IS: NIH Stroke Scale

Initial post:Each student will be assigned a number randomly.  Whatever your number is, select the corresponding topic below, then post a minimum of 5 bullet points about the topic.Your bullet points should address key components of the topic, such as what, how, who, & why.  This information should not be basic things you learned in Med/Surg, but rather advanced critical care based. Think about this as a group effort to create a study guide. Use ONLY your textbook, but do not cut & paste from the book.Then create, find, or borrow a test style question about your topic & post at the bottom of your bullet points. The format needs to be multiple choice or select all that apply. Think NCLEX style. Each week include a paragraph with the results from one of your weekly interviews.Discussion post assignments are worth 20 points each as follows: 

  • 5 points for the quality of your bullet points.
  • 5 points for the quality of your question.
  • 5 points for answering the question of a peer as your response.
  • 5 points for the quality of your rationale.
    • Quality is defined as thorough and thoughtful while demonstrating professional level knowledge of the topic.

Nursing homework help

Explore one of the agencies for quality improvement listed in this module's lecture. Write a one-page summary of what the agency does, who it affects, and how it is utilized.

Discussion 1 (HealthAssess)

Describe the findings associated with malignant skin changes (for example: persistent sores, lump or swelling, bleeding lesions, etc.)

Discuss

You are likely already upholding ethics in nursing and healthcare delivery in your current nursing practice experience. As mentioned in the introduction for this week, a patient-focused approach that promotes the delivery of safe, quality, and cost-effective healthcare for promoting positive patient outcomes represents a fundamental alignment to ethical principles for the delivery of healthcare. In your journey toward becoming a DNP-prepared nurse, you will continue to uphold ethical principles in your nursing practice and will likely continue to serve as an advocate for adhering to these principles in all you do.

For this Discussion, reflect on the case studies/scenarios related to ethical challenges presented in this week’s Learning Resources. Think about how these ethical challenges may mirror your own experiences in nursing practice. Consider what other ethical challenges may arise in your own nursing practice or as you continue your program of study.

Post an explanation of at least two significant ethical issues relevant to the DNP-prepared nurse. Then explain how these issues might compare to the types of issues you have encountered in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.

Required Readings

Nursing

1. Give an example of how you have advocated for a patient, peer or subordinate and the outcome.  How did acting as an advocate help you grow as a leader? (application).

2. Describe an example of strategic or operational planning you have seen in your place of work and appraise the outcome (pros and/or cons) of this planning (evaluation).

3. Analyze the type of organizational structure at your place of work, (which structure does it most closely resemble and why?) How does the structure influence mission, vision, philosophy, and values (evaluation)

4. Which power-building strategies (organizational, political and or personal) have you found to be the most effective for enhancing your personal power and why?  Which has been the least effective or hardest to achieve and why?