Nursing assignment
please review all supportive documents
informatics
As you learned from the chapter, reading, and video lectures, the cost of health care is a major concern in the US. As we discussed, value-based models promise to bend the cost curve in the right direction. The article you read by Erickson et al (2020) is mostly from the point of view of physicians so it is always a good idea to think critically about articles like this. Do you think that the authors present solid arguments in favor of what they propose? Do you think their point of view is similar to what you read and think about ways to decrease costs while increasing quality? Do you think that their point of view considers other health care-related professions?
FOCUSED SOAP NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION,5
How would you address the Caregiver role strain that the spouse is likely to undergo?
What are some important factors to consider when treating elderly patients?
Case 12
See attached instructions
Ethical Dilemma
Today’s health care environment gives nurses many reasons to be conflicted. Genetic testing, abortion, and end of life care are just some of the areas in which nurses may face ethical dilemmas. Consider how you feel about the following issues:
- Respecting the wishes of a suffering client that he is permitted to die with dignity,
- Respecting the health surrogate’s wishes regarding termination of life support,
- Or even observing another nurse take two tablets of oxycodone as ordered but keeping one for herself.
Then give an example of an ethical dilemma you may have confronted in your own clinical experience or workplace. How did you come to the decision you made? What feelings did you experience while coming to that choice? (If you have not yet faced an ethical dilemma, research one and comment on it, answering the same questions.)
At least 2 pages with reference
Nursing journal 2
see attached, same as last one need last 2 sections completed. see starred items that must be included.
2 page paperv
CAM treatment
Networking
Post a brief introduction of yourself to your colleagues. Include an explanation as to how Walden’s vision, mission, goals, and social change initiatives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner. Also include an explanation for how the Walden MSN Program Outcomes and perspectives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner. Finally, explain why networking is important and how it may help you achieve your professional and academic goals
Nursing ASSIGNMENT
To Prepare:
· Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
· Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
· Describe the project you propose.
· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
LEARNING RESOURCES
· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)
· Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)
· Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions:
The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site..
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration,
49(11), 543-548.
· Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018).
Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health.
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing,
36(5), 209-213.
· Sipes, C. (2016). Project management:
Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site..
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.
NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response topics are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is very vague or missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is very vague or missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.
6 to >0 pts
Poor
Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Nursing Homework
Purpose
The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
1. Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)
2. Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
Preparing the assignment:
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
a. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length.
2) The paper will include the following sections:
a. Clinical Question
· Describe the problem. What is the focus of your work?
· Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
· PICOT question in support of the group topic.
· State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem
statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”
b. Levels of Evidence
· Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).
· What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?
c. Search Strategy
· List search terms and results.
· Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.
· Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?
· Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).
d. Format
· Correct grammar and spelling.
· Include a title page.
· Use of headings for each section.
· Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion
· Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.
· 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice
RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice
RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines
© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved
NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1
© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved
NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1
© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved
NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1
image1.png
We Accept
