Topic 5 DQ 1

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in research studies to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Provide an example of a nursing practice problem that could be studied using a mixed methods approach.

Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

Topic 5 DQ 2

According to the textbook, nurses in various settings are adopting a research-based (or evidence-based) practice that incorporates research findings into their decisions and interactions with patients. Analyze the role nurses play in improving health care quality and safety through the use of evidence-based practice (EBP). How do you see this role being applied in your workplace? What internal stakeholder perspectives would you need to consider, including stakeholder support, in order to successfully implement an EBP project in your workplace?

Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

Final Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 “Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal” to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft.

 

Assessment tool for patient symptoms using the theory of unpleasant symptoms

  

  

Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide, what would you look for in an assessment tool for patient symptoms?

include 400 words in your initial post with two scholarly articles 

References in APA format. Turnitin 30% Max

Reply about Unpleasant symptoms

 Reply to the following discussion 200 words or more, APA style and at least 2 references, Turnitin less than 20 %

Theorical of Unpleasant Symptoms. Week 2 Discussion.

The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms (TOUS) provides a framework for understanding and assessing symptoms by considering three major components: symptom experience, influencing factors, and consequences of symptoms. Using TOUS as a guide, a nurse should look for the following key elements in an assessment tool:

·Symptom Experience (Nature and Characteristics of Symptoms)

Multiple symptoms: The tool should assess more than one symptom at a time since symptoms often occur in clusters.

Intensity: How severe is the symptom? (e.g., pain scale, fatigue scale).

Timing: Onset, duration, frequency.

Distress level: How bothersome is the symptom to the patient?

Quality: Descriptive aspects (e.g., burning pain, sharp pain, dull ache).

·Influencing Factors (Antecedents to Symptoms)

The assessment tool should capture factors that can influence symptoms, including:

Physiological factors: Underlying health conditions, medications, or treatments.

Psychological factors: Stress, anxiety, depression, coping mechanisms.

Situational factors: Environmental conditions, social support, financial status.

·Consequences of Symptoms (Impact on Functioning and Quality of Life)

Physical impact: Does the symptom limit mobility, energy levels, or physical activity?

Cognitive impact: Does it affect concentration, memory, or decision-making?

Emotional impact: Does it contribute to distress, anxiety, or depression?

Social impact: Does it affect relationships, work, or daily activities?

Additional Considerations for an Effective Assessment Tool

Standardization: Validated and reliable for clinical use.

Comprehensiveness: Covers all relevant symptoms without being too lengthy.

Patient-centered language: Easy for patients to understand and complete.

Scalability: Can be used across different populations (e.g., pediatric, geriatric, oncology).

A good example of an assessment tool aligned with TOUS principles is the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) for cancer patients or the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) for multiple symptoms. Would you like recommendations for a specific patient population?

Conclusion.
Utilizing TOUS as a guide in developing assessment tools ensures a thorough evaluation of patient symptoms by addressing their multidimensional nature, identifying influencing factors, and understanding the impact on performance. This comprehensive approach facilitates personalized care strategies aimed at alleviating symptoms and enhancing overall well-being.

NGR6002c Advance Health Assessment

Case Study: A 45-year-old white man presents to your office complaining of left knee pain that started last night. He says that the pain started suddenly after dinner and was severe within a span of 3 hours. He denies any trauma, fever, systemic symptoms, or prior similar episodes. He has a history of hypertension for which he takes hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). He admits to consuming a great amount of wine last night with dinner .On examination, his temperature is 98°F, his pulse is 90 beats/min, his respirations are 22 breaths/min, and his blood pressure is 129/88 mm Hg. Heart and lung examinations are unremarkable. The patient is reluctant to flex the left knee, wincing in pain at touch, and has passive range of motion. The knee is edematous, hot to touch, and has erythema of the overlying skin. No crepitation or deformity is apparent. No other joints are involved. Inguinal lymph nodes are not enlarged. Complete blood count (CBC) reveals a white blood cell count of 10,900 cells/mm3 and is otherwise normal.

 

NGR6002c Advance Health Assessment

Case Study: A 45-year-old white man presents to your office complaining of left knee pain that started last night. He says that the pain started suddenly after dinner and was severe within a span of 3 hours. He denies any trauma, fever, systemic symptoms, or prior similar episodes. He has a history of hypertension for which he takes hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). He admits to consuming a great amount of wine last night with dinner .On examination, his temperature is 98°F, his pulse is 90 beats/min, his respirations are 22 breaths/min, and his blood pressure is 129/88 mm Hg. Heart and lung examinations are unremarkable. The patient is reluctant to flex the left knee, wincing in pain at touch, and has passive range of motion. The knee is edematous, hot to touch, and has erythema of the overlying skin. No crepitation or deformity is apparent. No other joints are involved. Inguinal lymph nodes are not enlarged. Complete blood count (CBC) reveals a white blood cell count of 10,900 cells/mm3 and is otherwise normal.

 

Reply to Assessment of Patient Symptoms Using the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms

 Reply to the following discussion, using 200 words or more APA style, 2 or more references, Turnitin less than 20 %

The theory of unpleasant symptoms (TOUS) describes various aspects of the clients presenting a set of symptoms since they are complex. This theory posits that symptoms are not expressed in isolation of physiological, psychological, or situational factors, which affect the levels of productivity (Lenz & Pugh, 2020). According to the TOUS, the evaluation of symptoms experienced by patients should be done by an instrument that measures at least the intensity, annoyance or distress, temporal dimensions, and functional impairment of a symptom. Clinicians are therefore in a position to recognize the cause(s) of multiple symptoms rather than focusing on treating individual symptoms, which are signs of dysfunction in Living Conditions.

Tools to Evaluate TOUS

One of the fundamental points of a good symptom and symptom dimensions assessment tool is to measure academic achievement validly. Studies carried out in the recent past have pointed out that symptom assessment should not only be a severity questionnaire, but also duration, frequency, and distress level of the symptoms should be considered to increase the understanding of the symptoms from the patient’s perspective (Smith et al., 2023). For instance, while pain of different intensity is often associated with the postpartum period after childbirth, the assessment of the condition of a woman is not complete if only the pain in her body is considered because after childbirth, a woman also feels emotionally distressed and tired. Therefore, a tool developed based on the TOUS should include reliable scales for pain, fatigue, mood, and any changes in cognition, with all aspects of the symptoms addressed.

Another question relates to the impact of antecedent factors on symptoms as provided by the TOUS. Biological factors, for example, infection, psychological factors, stress and anxiety, social factors, stress and support, or environmental factors, stress or post-traumatic stress, can all alter symptoms perception (Lenz & Pugh, 2020). Thus, the assessment tool must contain those sections that may be used to assess the patient’s history, his/her emotional state, and influence. Measures such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale or the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory are connected to the TOUS model as they consider symptom clusters instead of single complaints (Brown et al., 2022).

Lastly, a valid and reliable assessment tool should also be clinically useful and applicable in various patients’ clinical conditions. Since the signs vary because of demography and culture, it is crucial to validate the instruments in various groups for reliability (Smith et al., 2023). Mobile applications that can be adopted to track patient symptoms have been commonly prescribed as they help in real-time follow-up and interaction between the patient and healthcare provider.

Conclusion

By summarizing the main points of the TOUS framework, it is possible to note the importance of the multidimensional and patient-centered approach to symptom assessment. Clinically optimal decision support tools are those that combine the aspects of symptom severity, distress, influencing factors, and performance. Coordinated care for patients is the current goal that can help in moving from disease management to disease prevention, thus improving the quality of services in relation to patient care.

C6A1

MANUSCRIPT SECTION I-III

PICOT QUESTION: Among clinic nursing staff (RN, LPN, Nurse Tech), will teaching burnout signs/symptoms and relaxation techniques, using a small group discussion, increase knowledge and perception of burnout signs/symptoms and relaxation techniques, in four weeks?

  1. Complete sections I-III of the MSN project template.
  2. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
  3. Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.
  4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
  5. NO PLAGIO MORE THAN 10% WILL BE ALLOWED OR WILL NEED UPDATES TO LOWER THAT %
  6. 3 PAGES

DUE DATE MARCH 12, 2025