critical thinking

/in /by

You are the Corporate Director for Universal Medical Supplies, Inc. You have been asked to present at an upcoming business leadership conference. The presentation will cover Critical Thinking for Challenges in Communication in the Workplace, related to specific topics. The intended audience is business leaders in many different industries.

Instructions

Choose an element of or an issue related to
one of the following specific workplace challenges: Conflict Resolution, Diversity Awareness, or Gender Issues. Create a slideshow presentation that includes concepts of critical thinking related to your chosen topic and include industry examples. Audio narration/voiceover must be incorporated that fully explains your ideas.

Your presentation should include:

· An introductory slide.

· Minimum of 2 slides on critical thinking skills in reading, listening, and writing, related to your chosen topic.

· Minimum of 2 slides on valid and invalid arguments, including cogent reasoning, related to your chosen topic.

· Minimum of 2 slides on inductive and deductive reasoning, related to your chosen topic.

· Minimum of 1 slide on inference in communication, related to your chosen topic.

· A conclusion slide to summarize ideas presented.

· Reference slide with all resources listed.

· Audio/voiceover narration to accompany the slideshow. It should be between 7 and 10 minutes in length and include detailed information about the topics on each slide.

Create a final presentation using a screen recording tool such as Screencast-O-Matic or PowerPoint with audio.

For assistance with creating a PowerPoint presentation with voiceover, please see the following:

·

Rasmussen Guide to Writing PowerPoint Presentations

·

How do I make a video of a PowerPoint presentation using Screencast-O-Matic?

·

How do I create an audio recording (with PowerPoint)?

Article Review

/in /by

Article Review on two nursing articles, I already picked them. In APA format, provide a summary/paraphrase of both articles and a review/evaluation and opinion on both articles. Provides minimum of 150-250 words with word count noted following annotated bib notation for each of the provided
articles.

Article Summary 1

/in /by

 

  1. What is the research question?
  2. What research method is being used?
  3. How are the subjects chosen (explain the parameters & how many)
  4. What are the results of the study?
  5. What are the recommendations?
  6. What is your opinion? 

Nursing

/in /by

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to investigate informatics in healthcare and to apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to its appropriate use in healthcare technology.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision‐making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in the delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 200 points

Preparing the assignment

Your faculty member will provide a scenario for you to address in your paper. Choose an ending to the scenario, and construct your paper based on those reflections. Choose one of the following outcomes for the end of the scenario:

1. A HIPAA violation occurs, and client data is exposed to the media.

2. A medication error has harmed a client.

3. A technology downtime that impacts patient care occurs, and an error is made.

4. A ransomware attack has occurred, and the organization must contemplate paying the ransom or lose access to patient data.

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Include the following sections:

a. Introduction – 20 points/10%

· Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

· Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

· Offers a compelling argument to elicit the readers attention and generate interest.

b. HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion – 20 points/10%

· Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

c. Scenario Ending and Recommendations – 50 points/25%

· Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

· Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

· Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

· Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

d. Advantages and Disadvantages – 50 points/25%

· Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

· Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

e. Conclusion and Reflections – 40 points/20%

· Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

· Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

· Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

· Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

f. APA Style and Organization – 20 points/10%

· References are submitted with assignment.

· Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

· Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

· Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

· At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

· A scenario is to be used to complete the RUA: We Can But Dare We paper that is due at the end of week 4. Below is the scenario; please do not use any other scenario for this assignment. Logistics and details, including scenario ending choices, regarding the paper can be found in the RUA: We Can But Dare We grading rubric found in the Unit 4 module.

Scenario:

You are an emergency department nurse responding to a severe freeway accident. As a triage registered nurse determining the severity of each case and maintaining proper flow, it is your duty to review all patients impacted by this event. While reviewing patients coming in, you stumble across a familiar name, which happens to be the name of a famous actor, Governor Gru. Upon determining this, you happen to take a photo of the data and post about the finding on your social media account.

To complete this paper, please choose an appropriate scenario ending listed in the RUA We Can But Dare We rubric (which is also attached to this announcement).

 

THIS IS AN INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT. Each of you will write your own paper.

This assignment will be submitted to Turn It In and will be screened for integrity violations. TRY NOT use quotes of any kind. (1 is acceptable). If you paraphrase and cite all content you will significantly reduce your similarity score.

 FOLLOW THE RUBRIC to receive full points! 

Please reach out to your assigned faculty member with questions!


NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare

We Can, But Dare We? Guidelines

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 1

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Section not present

Introduction

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

2. Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

3. Offers a compelling argument to elicit the reader’s attention and generate interest.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

2. Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

3. Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Scenario Ending and Recommendations

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

2. Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

3. Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

4. Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Advantages and Disadvantages

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

2. Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

3. Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

4. Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Conclusion and Reflections

(40 points/20%)

40 points

34 points

30 points

15 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

2. Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

3. Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

4. Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

APA Style and Organization

(20 points/10%)

20 points

18 points

16 points

8 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. References are submitted with assignment.

2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

4. Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

5. At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

Includes all requirements for section.

Includes 4 requirements for section.

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 1-2 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Total Points Possible = 200 points

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 4

image1.png

evidence based

/in /by



image1.png

questions

/in /by

Original Work, No Plagiarism, Cite and Reference

Kara is a pre-doctoral student who works for a very demanding principal investigator (PI) in psychology. Dr. Srichaphan considers himself her mentor even though he seems to offer no constructive guidance.

She considers herself an expert problem solver. The trouble is, she can’t figure out how to solve her problems with her mentor. Not only is he exacting and demanding, but he also is exploitative and intolerant—finding fault with her for not being able to keep up with the rigors of academic and clinical studies even though he’s the one who’s overloading her with too much work.

The last straw is an invitation to be a “guest lecturer” in a section of her mentor’s undergraduate cognitive processes class. She can’t very well say no. It would only make her look inept. Still, it couldn’t come at a worse time. The research study that Kara is primary coordinator of has just been halted—it turns out one of the protocols needs many changes, and some of the changes will have to go through the IRB again. They are complex and require careful thought. All the protocol forms will need to be filled out again, the consent forms revised, and the study procedures redone. These changes will have to be made quickly since the study cannot resume until the IRB approves of the new modifications. 

Meanwhile, the undergraduate section of the class Kara’s been given to lead is so large that it’s fast becoming like a full teaching load. The course is not going well because the syllabus that her mentor developed was not well thought out, and many students are coming to Kara’s office to complain. One of the complaints is that there is a cheating ring among some of the students. When she tells her mentor, Dr. Srichaphan blames it on her teaching. She is so taken aback that all she can do is splutter that it’s not her fault—the cheating ring extends to other study sections as well and may even have begun there. Ignoring her protests, he informs her that she needs to provide assistance at a clinical rotation site.

Kara can’t believe her ears. She feels like she will crack under the strain if one more thing is added to her load of duties. Just the thought of arguing with her mentor makes her queasy, but she does her best to remind him that she has her own coursework as a doctoral student and has two term papers due in the next three weeks. She begs him to assign someone else to the clinical rotation. He frowns. “It’s gotten to the point where you cannot handle your research and teaching responsibilities, evidently,” he goads her.  Kara, who prides herself on her “can do” style, finds she simply cannot do all that is required of her. She’s on the verge of retching from nerves. Her mentor is not impressed. He shakes his head and tells her that science is not for the faint of heart.

Questions

1. What’s the worst thing that could happen if she does nothing?

2. What’s the worst that could happen if she seeks a new approach to getting through this?

3. How might Kara ask for help? From whom? With what likely result?

4. What types of expectations should have been discussed among Kara, the mentor, the program director, and/or the graduate school to avoid these types of problems?

5. Can you offer an example of stressful or disastrous situation based on your own learning experiences? How did you deal with it, and what lessons did you learn?

Describe two external stressors that are unique to adolescents. Discuss what risk-taking behaviors may result from the external stressors and what support or coping mechanism can be introduced.

/in /by

Describe two external stressors that are unique to adolescents. Discuss what risk-taking behaviors may result from the external stressors and what support or coping mechanism can be introduced.

Case Study 3 and 4

/in /by

Case Study 3 & 4 (10 Points) 

Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

Case Studies will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)

Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

unit 4 551

/in /by

Two-week-old Tabitha has infant respiratory distress syndrome. Eighty-year-old Anthony has emphysema, and 50-year-old Jenny has pulmonary fibrosis.

Why are the mechanics of breathing greatly compromised in all of these cases?

INSTRUCTIONS: This is a discussion post. So, a page in length or a page and a half is enough. Must have at least 3 references and has to be in Apa format. 

Conc of Pathophys week 6

/in /by

Week 6 Discussion: Neurological Alterations  (USLOs 1, 2, 3, 4)

You are caring for a 68-year-old Akio Kim in the emergency department for rule-out Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). Mr. Kim's daughter reported that he woke up that morning with left-sided weakness and slurred speech.

Based on this information, your prior knowledge of this client (refer to medical card from the Collins-Kim family tree interactive), and your knowledge of the pathophysiology of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), respond to the following prompts:

1. Thoroughly explain the pathophysiology of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). Use a 
scholarly or 
authoritative source to support your answer.

2. Examine each of the following three factors related to this disease process. 
Support all three with a scholarly source.

1. cultural

2. financial

3. environmental implications

3. Identify 3-5 priority nursing interventions for the client while in the emergency department.

4. Describe labs and diagnostic testing you would want to include in client’s plan of care and why. What are critical indicators? 
Support with a scholarly source.

5. What members of the interdisciplinary team need to be included for holistic patient-centered care? 
Provide a rationale and support with a scholarly source.