Case 16
See attached report.
See attached report.
Week 6: Problem-Focused SOAP Note
USE the template that I gave you before. Needs the 1st blank paper for cover sheet.
Some Rubric
Some Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcomes (Subjective)
10 pts
Accomplished
Symptom analysis is well organized, with C/C, OLD
CART, pertinent negatives, and pertinent positives. All
data needed to support the diagnosis & differential
are present. Is complete, concise, and relevant with
no extraneous data.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome (Objective)
10 pts
Accomplished
Complete, concise, well organized, well written, and
includes pertinent positive and pertinent negative
physical findings. Organized by body system in list
format. No extraneous data.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
(Assessment)
10 pts
Accomplished
Diagnosis and differential dx are correct, include ICD
code, and are supported by subjective and objective
data.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome (Plan) 10 pts
Accomplished
Plan is organized, complete and supported with 2
evidence-based references. Addresses each diagnosis
and is individualized to the specific patient and
includes medication teaching and all 5 components:
(Dx plan, Tx plan, patient education, referral/follow-
up, health maintenance).
10 pts
Total Points: 40
Patient initial: R. R
DOB: June/1991 Sex: F
Encounter Date: 08/08/2023
SUBJECTIVE:
Chief Complaint:
History Of Present Illness:
appt is requested for URI
Medical History:
#. COVID 1/2022
#. hemorrhoids
#. Postpartum Depression, Anxiety, panic attacks
#. ADD
#. Insomnia
#. Allergic rhinitis
#. Psoriasis
#. Onychymycosis
Surgical History:
none
Gynecological History:
G2 P2 A0
Family History:
M: living, arrhythmia, palpitations
F: living, healthy
S: asthma
Social History:
-Married
-Lives with husband, 2 kids, and grandparents
-Authorization coordiinator at USC Keck, also student in digital marketing
-Denies tobacco use
-etoh use: Socially
-Denies illicit drug use
Smoking Status: Never Smoked
Allergies:
No known allergies
Current Medications:
———————————-
Paxil 10 mg po qd
xanax 0.25 mg prn panic attacks
Adderall 20mg bid prn
———————————
Review of System:
Constitutional: Patient denies weight change, fever, chills, weakness, fatigue, sleep
changes, appetite changes.
Head: Patient denies headache.
Neck: Patient denies abnormal masses, neck stiffness.
Eyes: Patient denies vision loss, blurring, discharge, excessive tearing, dryness.
Ears: Patient denies hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, discharge, pain
Nose: #sinus congestion#
Mouth: Patient denies ulcers, bleeding gums, taste problems.
Throat: #sore throat#
Cardiovascular: Patient denies chest pain, chest pressure, palpitations, DOE,
orthopnea.
Respiratory: #dry cough#
Patient denies shortness of breath, increased sputum, hemoptysis.
Gastrointestinal: #looser stools, frequency, occ incontinence#
Patient denies nausea, vomiting, heartburn, dysphagia, constipation, melena,
abdominal pain, jaundice, hemorrhoids.
Genitourinary: #urinary urgency and frequency, occasional incontinence#
Patient denies abnormal hesitancy, hematuria, dysuria, nocturia, stones.
Musculoskeletal: Patient denies arthralgias, joint stiffness, myalgias, muscle
weakness, instability and abnormal range of motion
Integumentary (Skin and/or Breast): Patient denies rash, lesions, changes in hair,
changes in nail, pruritus
Neurological: Patient denies headache, syncope, seizures, vertigo, ataxia, diplopia,
tremor, numbness, tingling.
Psychiatric: #depression, anxiety, ADD#
Patient denies mood abnormalities, memory loss, difficulty sleeping, appetite
changes
Endocrine: Patient denies sensitivity to cold or heat, polyuria, polydipsia.
Hematologic/Lymphatic: Patient denies bleeding, bruising, lymphadenopathy.
GYN: #menorrhagia#
Patient denies changes in menstrual cycle, hot flashes.
OBJECTIVE:
Physical Exam:
Constitutional: #last exam done on 7/10/23 showed#
WD, WN, Alert, Oriented X3 in NAD. Affect appropriate. Gait normal.
Eye: PERRLA, EOMI, nl conjunctiva
Ear: No pinnea/tragal tenderness. Drums are visualized, no wax in canals
Nose: N1 mucosa. N1 Nasal septal walls and turbinates.
Mouth: N1 bucal mucosa, no lesions noted.
Throat: Clear, no erythema or exudates.
Neck: #thyroid fullness R#
supple, no masses. Trachea is midline. N1 carotid auscultation. No JVD
Cardiovascular: RRR, N1 S1 and S2, No cardiac murmurs, rubs or gallops.
Lungs: ctab, no wheezes, rhonchi or crackles
Chest/Breasts: deferred
Gastrointestinal (Abdomen): soft, nt, nd, bs(+). No palpable masses.
Genitourinary: #negative CVAT#
deferred
Lymphatic: -No LAN noted
Musculoskeletal: good ROM. Strength symmetrical and wnl. No muscle weakness or
stiffness. No joint effusion or ttp.
Skin: Normal color and texture. No lesions seen.
Extremities: Warm, no clubbing, cyanosis or edema. N1 DP/PT pulses bilaterally
Neurological/Psychiatric: CN I-XII intact, neurosensory wnl, strength (5/5), (2+) DTR
UE/LE bilaterally -Judgment and insight intact
ASSESSMENT:
Diagnosis:
ICD-10 Codes:
1)J069; Upper respiratory infection, unspecified
PLAN:
Procedures (CPT code):
1) 99213; Detailed
2) 99401; 15 min
Medications:
Promethazine-DM 6.25-15 MG/5ML Oral Syrup; Take 5 ml orally every 4 hours Take
as needed for dry cough; Qty: 120; Refills: 0
Care Plan:
.***URI- x4 days, sore throat, sinus congestion, dry cough, headache. took
tylenol/cough syrup, claritin with not much relief. sent home today from work, COVID
test today from work pending results. sisters also similar sxs, but has tested
negative for COVID.
-off work this week
-Rx promethazine/DM 5mL prn cough, r/b d/w pt
-sudafed and tylenol prn
-f/u 1 week, if no improvement and covid neg, come back in office for exam
***urinary incontinence- h/o occasional stress incontinence, however over last 1 mo,
c/o increasing urengency, frequency and 2 episodes of incontinence, which occured
with only minimal alcohol use. denies hematuria, dysuria. c/o menorrhagia
worsening after delivering her 2 yo. denies LBP/trauma/saddle paresthesia
-pelvic floor PT ordered
-UA/UCx ordered
-referred to uro gyn
-ordered transvaginal u/s r/o uterine fibroids
-counseled on wt loss. keep voiding journal
-avoid irritants such as caffeine/ETOH
***diarrhea- c/o looser stools, 4-5xd and few episodes of incontinence. c/o abd
cramping after bm, othewise no abd pain, fever, melena, wt loss. has had h/o abd
pain and cramping which we ordered stool studies, CRP, ESR but pt never did.
denies LBP/trauma/saddle paresthesia. abd exam normal today
-ordered stool studies, ESR, CRP
-referred to GI
-ER precautions
***Hyperlipidemia, lipoprotein deficiency- On 1/16/23, FLP showed 237/47/182/156.
Has lost 6 lbs intentionally since last visit.
-Rec low fat, low carb diet
-FLP with next annual
***obesity- BMI 31.37, wt 221 lbs, Has lost 6 lbs intentionally since last visit.
-counseled
***thyroid fullness- noted on exam. 1/16/23, TSH wnl.
-ordered thyroid u/s 11/8/22, pt has not done yet
Plan Notes Continued: .
***trigger finger- unsure of duration, ono/off. R ring finger locks. Pt has seen hand
specialist in the past for another issue
-Rx ibuprofen as noted above, r/b d/w pt
-pt rec to f/u with hand specialist
***Vitamin D deficiency- On 1/16/23, Vitamin D level was 24. not supplementing.
-Rec Vitamin D 4000 IU qd
-Vitamin D level with next annual
***Onychymycosis- b/l feet on PEX on 2/1/23. pt is interested in tx.
-given the interactions between terbinafine and her psychiatric meds, I rec she
checked with them first before we start
***Depression, Anxiety- F/b psychiatrist, Dr. Askins and psychologist, Dr. Tricia
Duncan Hassle. Takes Paxil 10 mg po qd and xanax 0.25 mg prn panic attacks.
Denies SI/HI.
-mgmt per psych
***ADD- F/b psychiatrist, Dr. Askins. Takes Adderall 20mg bid prn.
-mgmt per psych
Patient Instructions: .
.
-Pt has been instructed to take medications as prescribed
-Pt received education on compliance with medications and recommendations
-Pt received counseling regarding Medication Side Effects
-Pt received counseling on following a well-balanced healthy diet with veg, fruit and
fiber.
-Pt was instructed to do CV exercise at least 3-4 times every week for 30 minutes.
PHCM: .
.
31 y/o F:
-Annual physical: done 2/1/23- next due 2/1/24
-Annual labs: done 1/16/23- next due 1/16/24
-Cervical CA screening: managed by GYN
-Skin CA screening; Referred to derm on 3/30/22
Immunizations:
Tetanus: doen 2021- next due 2031
Influenza: Fall 2022
COVID19: Pfizer in 7/1/21, bivalent booster Pfizer 1/14/23
HPV: will check records
Answer the questions below based on the following case study.
A 41-year-old man presents to his PCP with feelings of hopelessness, sadness, and helplessness. He says that he cries for no reason, and has difficulty sleeping. He noticed that the problems began about 6 weeks before, and he did not feel able to shrug them off. He has been drinking more alcohol than usual and has stopped going to work. When on his own, he admitted that he had thought of driving his car into the nearest canal.
Submission Instructions:
please see the attached assigned Population Based Case Study. You are to complete all the questions in the attached document -this should be submitted in an APA word document and be supported with references where appropriate. Please make sure to include the name of the Case study in the title page. Please follow the grading rubric that is attached to see how this case study will be graded.
After reviewing Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following;
How do family, friends, and community influence individual health and lifestyle? Identify at least 3 positive and 3 negative effects.
Submission Instructions:
Practicum Part 2 – Health Care Disparities
(This is a continuation of part 1 with the homeless population in FL)
In this assignment, you will
1. Use your assessment data from week 3 to identify significant health disparities in your at-risk group.
2. Research and propose recommendations to decrease one of these disparities.
3. Write a 2-page (500 word) paper in the form of a proposal to area leaders to address the disparity in your community. Your proposal should include:
· A description of the disparity.
· The influences the disparity has on healthcare delivery.
· The influences the disparity has on similar populations in other countries and the provision of global healthcare.
· Recommendations to address the problem.
· Any graphs or charts in your document that are needed to support your proposal.
Cite any sources in APA format with the url link
Please see the attachment for instructions
I have attached the guidelines for this assignment
Examine
Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
· Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
· Which decision did you select?
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
· Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Case
BACKGROUND
Katie is an 8 year old Caucasian female who is brought to your office today by her mother & father. They report that they were referred to you by their primary care provider after seeking her advice because Katie’s teacher suggested that she may have ADHD. Katie’s parents reported that their PCP felt that she should be evaluated by psychiatry to determine whether or not she has this condition.
The parents give the PMHNP a copy of a form titled
“Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised”. This scale was filled out by Katie’s teacher and sent home to the parents so that they could share it with their family primary care provider. According to the scoring provided by her teacher, Katie is inattentive, easily distracted, forgets things she already learned, is poor in spelling, reading, and arithmetic. Her attention span is short, and she is noted to only pay attention to things she is interested in. The teacher opined that she lacks interest in school work and is easily distracted. Katie is also noted to start things but never finish them, and seldom follows through on instructions and fails to finish her school work.
Katie’s parents actively deny that Katie has ADHD. “She would be running around like a wild person if she had ADHD” reports her mother. “She is never defiant or has temper outburst” adds her father.
SUBJECTIVE
Katie reports that she doesn’t know what the “big deal” is. She states that school is “OK”- her favorite subjects are “art” and “recess.” She states that she finds her other subjects boring, and sometimes hard because she feels “lost”. She admits that her mind does wander during class to things that she thinks of as more fun. “Sometimes” Katie reports “I will just be thinking about nothing and the teacher will call my name and I don’t know what they were talking about.”
Katie reports that her home life is just fine. She reports that she loves her parents and that they are very good and kind to her. Denies any abuse, denies bullying at school. Offers no other concerns at this time.
MENTAL STATUS EXAM
The client is an 8 year old Caucasian female who appears appropriately developed for her age. Her speech is clear, coherent, and logical. She is appropriately oriented to person, place, time, and event. She is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. She demonstrates no noteworthy mannerisms, gestures, or tics. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect is bright. Katie denies visual or auditory hallucinations, no delusional or paranoid thought processes readily appreciated. Attention and concentration are grossly intact based on Katie’s attending to the clinical interview and her ability to count backwards from 100 by serial 2’s and 5’s. Insight and judgment appear age appropriate. Katie denies any suicidal or homicidal ideation.
Diagnosis: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive presentation
RESOURCES
§ Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. A., & Epstein, J. N. (1998). Revision and restandardization of the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factors, structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 279-291.
Decision Point One
Begin Wellbutrin (bupropion) XL 150 mg orally daily
RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE
· Client returns to clinic in four weeks
· Katie’s parents inform you that they stopped giving Katie the medication because about 2 weeks into the prescription, Katie told her parents that she was thinking about hurting herself. This scared the parents, but they didn’t want to “bother you” by calling the office, so they felt that it would be best to just stop the medication as they would be seeing you in two weeks
Decision Point Two
Educate the parents that Bupropion sometimes causes suicidal ideation in children and that this is normal, and re-start the drug at the previous dose
RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO
Client returns to clinic in four weeks
Katie's parents again report that after about a week of treatment with the Bupropion, Katie began telling her parents that she wanted to hurt herself and began having dreams about being dead. This scared her parents, and they stopped giving her the medication At this point, they are quite upset with the results of their daughter’s treatment and are convinced that medication is not the answer
Decision Point Three
Refer the parents to a pediatric psychologist who can use behavioral therapy to treat Katie’s ADHD.
Guidance to Student
Bupropion is used off-label for ADHD and is used more commonly in adults. It’s mechanism of action results in increasing the neurotransmitters norepinephrine/noradrenaline and dopamine. Since dopamine is inactivated by norepinephrine reuptake in frontal cortex, (which largely lacks dopamine transporters) bupropion can increase dopamine neurotransmission in this part of the brain, which may explain its effectiveness in ADHD. However, Bupropion as well as other antidepressants have been linked to suicidal ideation in children and adolescents- despite the fact that it was being used initially to treat ADHD, it is still an antidepressant.
At this point, the parents are probably quite frustrated as no parent wants to hear their child talking about hurting themselves or having dreams about being dead. If the parents are adamant about no more medications, referral to a pediatric psychologist or similar therapist skilled in the use of behavioral therapies to treat ADHD in children. However, it should be noted that behavioral therapies work best when combined with medication, however, if the parents are insistent, then behavioral therapy may be the only alternative left in the treatment of Katie.
In terms of the pathophysiology of ADHD, whereas it may be true that increasing age may demonstrate some improvement in symptoms (some people will actually experience complete resolution of symptoms by adulthood), it is not helping Katie in the here and now. Katie still needs help with her symptoms which are causing academic issues.
The PMHNP should attempt to repair the rupture in the therapeutic alliance (the parents now believe that medications are not the answer) by explaining rationale for the use of Bupropion (many people like to start with Bupropion because it has a low-risk for addiction). The family should be encouraged to allow the PMHNP to initiate Adderall as it has a very good track record in terms of its efficacy in treating ADHD.
response to your Blog describing your own experiences with intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration in your nursing practice. What were the strengths and weaknesses of this collaboration? How might your own experiences mirror the perspectives and viewpoints presented in the Henry et al. (2018) case study design approach? Be specific and provide examples.
Submitmyhomework.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations. It can be used for generating new ideas and thoughts for your own project, additional insight into the subject, or encouragement for further researches.

