wk4691B

/in /by

1

This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your

previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If

you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next

writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write

about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If

you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One

week for this job.

Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your

previous writings.

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933

Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

2

This week, you will bring together all of the assignments you have completed thus far,
and compose the rough draft of your change project paper. At this point, you will have
submitted each section and received feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident. 
Your rough draft contains all of the expected
components of the final draft and is presented in APA format including a cover page,
references, and appendices when warranted. Your rough draft is your opportunity to
polish previously submitted assignments and combine the sections in a comprehensive
paper that show your change project is ready to be implemented.

You will take this time to identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in your change

project. Your rough draft should only require minor revisions before the final paper.

Your paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,

references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and

format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (rough draft)

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper

Rubic (rough draft)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The change project topic is introduced. All

background information is included. Project

importance within the field or significance

for the designated facility is described.

3.5
pts

3

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the

chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem

thoroughly, including the target population

description and history/background information

at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance

and applicability to nursing is included and well

presented. Includes an appropriate topic

identification related to an advanced practice

nursing issue or practice problem of concern.

Population is fully defined and present in the

research question. Includes specific interventions,

identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate

outcomes in a timely manner for the question.

Overall, the question is well-built using the PICOT

format.

3.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed

articles, books, or limited non-research literature

(tool kits or standardized procedures) are present.

Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is

credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support

the main topic. In-text citations are present and

correctly formatted. Presents a thorough and

insightful analysis of significant findings related to

the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and

professionally sound and creative. Insightful and

comprehensive conclusions and solutions are

present.

3.5
pts

4

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are

well-developed. They are clear and thorough. Aims

include examples of projected features and

functions. Values include implementation benefits

for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes state the

purpose, have a quality focus, and describe the

benefits that will occur as a result of

implementation.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies independent theories or conceptual models

that relate to the change project topic and describes

how they will be applied to the change project.

Thoroughly discusses how each element of the

phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly

applies each element of the theory to the elements

of the phenomenon under study. Develops the

rationale for the sample selection criteria, and

expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent

research that uses the framework.

7 pts

5

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides keen insight into obstacles and proposes

sound, creative solutions or interventions based on

the literature review findings. Expertly compares

other views on the problem and solutions with detail.

Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in

the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its significance

to the nursing profession and filling gaps in

knowledge. Accurately categorizes and thoroughly

explains specific methods of data collection to be

used. Explains in detail how data will be analyzed and

used. Provides a sound justification for subject

selection and sampling procedure. Accurately and

thoroughly describes potential limitations to data

collection and control.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an insightful and thorough summary of the

project, main points, and details the significance of

the project to the advanced practice nursing

profession. Provides detailed and creative

recommendations for future research and

implications for clinical practice. Discusses limitations

of the study in detail. Suggests specific directions for

future research. Insightfully considers changes in

theoretical construct and provides reasonable and

creative suggestions for public policy and/or changes

in educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical

framework to the overall product.

10.5
pts

6

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Rough
Draft

17.5 to >14.35 pts

Meets Expectations

Submission shows a concerted effort to present a

high-quality draft requiring minimal adjustments to

content and mechanics. All parts of the research

paper are submitted and efforts to integrate

feedback are highly apparent. Significant and

substantive improvements have been made to each

section of the paper.

17.5
pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA

10.5 to >8.61 pts

Meets Expectations

Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.

Information is well organized and clearly

communicated. The assignment is free of spelling and

grammatical errors. All the requirements related to

format, length, source citations, and layout are

followed. A complete reference page is included and

formatted using correct APA format. If applicable,

appendices and tables are complete and

appropriate.The

10.5
pts

Total Points: 70

7

  • Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft

Module 3 Discussion

/in /by

Single-payer Systems – What Works (and What Doesn’t Work) Outside of the United States

After researching a country (outside of the United States) with a single-payer health care system, share a summary of information regarding how the single-payer system works in that country of your choice. Include both the specific benefits and specific drawbacks of the system. Look at the discussion board to see what countries’ information has already been posted, and choose a country that is not posted yet to ensure a wide variety of examples for us to review. Your summary should be a concise 200-word response, using peer-reviewed sources to find facts to support your points.

DISCUSSION REPLIES

/in /by

“Respond to at least four of the colleagues post by visiting the websites they shared and offering additional examples of EBP or alternative views/interpretations to those shared in your colleagues’ posts.”

Colleagues post attached 

COPD

/in /by

 

Treatment goals for an acute exacerbation of COPD are two-fold.  The first is to provide supportive care and resolve the acute exacerbation with minimal impact on the patient lung function, and the second is to prevent further exacerbations.

Read the article, “Managing hospitalized patients with a COPD exacerbation: the role of hospitalists and the multidisciplinary team”.  You may access the article at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2021.2018257  

Discuss the recommended goals/treatment strategies of COPD management in critically ill patient. 

Instructions:

Post your discussion to the Moodle Discussion Forum.  Initial post must be made by Day #3.  Word limit 500 words.  Reply to at least two other student posts with a reflection of their response.  Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

Discussion post

/in /by

need someone to complete a discussion post 

 

To successfully complete your discussion question, complete the Recent Life Changes Questionnaire (R-RLCQ) by Michelle Cederberg which is located in Unit 1. After you evaluate your personal findings, review the lesson from chapter 13 on Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and submit a 250-word discussion on your reaction to the stressor. What assessment findings did you identify? How did you respond to the stressor(s)? Identify at least two treatment options.

Provide at least one current scholarly article to support your discussion. (Not older than 5 years).

Review the rubric for required elements.

Nursing Reflection Assignment

/in /by

I have attached the guidelines for this assignment

customer service IP2

/in /by

 

Transportation

This major airline had a rocky road at its start. Incorporated in 1967, it never actually started flying planes until June of 1971 because of lengthy legal challenges by other major airlines. When it finally started services between Dallas and Houston and Dallas and San Antonio, it used three Boeing 737 aircraft and offered $20 one-way fares. Soon, the company introduced a $10 “night fare” and several other attractive schemes. In 1973, it ended the year with its first profits since starting operations and began developing a loyal customer base.

By the 1990s, this airline had become well-established as a major passenger carrier with popular campaigns that focused on families such as the “Family Fare.” By 2000, the company had moved up to number two on this famous list and had expanded its rewards program for customers. Beyond that, as the decade progressed and moved into the second decade of this century, this airline instituted a number of other discount flight initiatives that encouraged air travel and expanded its customer reach.

Assignment Details

Answer the following questions :

  1. Based on what you read here and learned on the airline’s Web site, what are the company’s strengths related to customer service?
  2. Would you fly this airline, if you have not already? Why or why not?
  3. As a current or potential customer of the airline, what would you expect as a service experience from the airline?

CCRS Suicide Assessment Tool , Writing Guru

/in /by

Assignment for tomorrow AM by 7AM 

Plagiarism

/in /by

CLICK LINK BELOW

https://plagiarism.iu.edu/index.html

Look at the tabs on the right and click
”Take Certification Test” then stroll down and click
“I’m an undergraduate college student or advanced high school student”

The login for is

E-mail:

[email protected]

Password: Sunday0064

ASSESSING THE GENITALIA AND RECTUM

/in /by

 

Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.

  • Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  • Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.