Nursing journal 2

/in /by

see attached, same as last one need last 2 sections completed. see starred items that must be included.

2 page paperv

/in /by

 CAM treatment

Networking

/in /by

 Post a brief introduction of yourself to your colleagues. Include an explanation as to how Walden’s vision, mission, goals, and social change initiatives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner. Also include an explanation for how the Walden MSN Program Outcomes and perspectives relate to your professional and academic goals and to your becoming a scholar-practitioner. Finally, explain why networking is important and how it may help you achieve your professional and academic goals 

Nursing ASSIGNMENT

/in /by

To Prepare:

· Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.

· Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:

· Describe the project you propose.

· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.

· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.

· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.

· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.

· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)

· Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)

· Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions:
The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site..
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration,
49(11), 543-548.

· Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018).
Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health.
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing,
36(5), 209-213.

· Sipes, C. (2016). Project management:
Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site..
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response topics are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.
8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.
7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.
6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Nursing Homework

/in /by

Purpose

The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

1. Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

2. Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)

Preparing the assignment:

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

a. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length.

2) The paper will include the following sections:

a. Clinical Question

· Describe the problem. What is the focus of your work?

· Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.

· PICOT question in support of the group topic.

· State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem

statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”

b. Levels of Evidence

· Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).

· What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?

c. Search Strategy

· List search terms and results.

· Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.

· Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?

· Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).

d. Format

· Correct grammar and spelling.

· Include a title page.

· Use of headings for each section.

· Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion

· Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.

· 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_NOV23 1

image1.png

An Advocate campaign

/in /by

 

To Prepare:

  • Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.

Resources:

 

 The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
  • Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
  • Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
  • Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?

Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:

  • Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
  • Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.
  • Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
  • At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.

 

nursing

/in /by

 The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based literature. 

THERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH PERSONALITY DISORDERS

/in /by

See attachment for resources 

Intro to nursing reaearch

/in /by

 The three types of qualitative research designs are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. Compare the differences and similarities between two of the three types of qualitative studies and give an example of each. 

CDS

/in /by

Part 1:

  • Research and  review at least four peer-reviewed articles on evidence-based practice applied in clinical decision support (CDS). Must be within 5 years.

Matrix attached

Part 2: Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Recommendation

Develop a 10- to 12-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you present your research and data to support your clinical decision support (CDS) recommendation for quality improvement.

Based on your research, address the following in your presentation:

  • Synthesize your findings from your four articles, focusing on applicable models and/or theories relevant to CDS, quality improvement in your workplace, and on applicable evidence-based practice in nursing.
  • Recommend CDS or information to consider in clinical decision making and explain your rationale for the recommendation. Be specific.
  • Justify your recommendation. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Recommend how you would address possible limitations or challenges, including:
    • Explain how you would avoid alert fatigue.
    • Explain under what conditions you would allow an override to an alert.
    • Explain how you would monitor compliance.
    • Identify factors that might contribute to continuous overrides.
    • Justify conditions under which an override may be necessary.
  • Provide references in APA style at the end of your presentation—the reference slide or slides do not count toward your assignment total.