Case study preschool child

/in /by

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide evidence-based rationales  citation and references for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed.

Ricky, age 4 years, arrives in the clinic with his mother. Ricky lives with his mother and father, who both work full-time, and his infant sister. Their extended family lives in a different state more than 100 miles away. Both parents are of average height and in good health. Ricky’s mother mentions that Ricky often expresses frustration, particularly in regard to food. Conflict over food occurs every day. Mealtime is a battle to get him to eat, unless his mother feeds him. Ricky’s baby sister seems to tolerate all baby foods but requires her mother to spoon-feed. Ricky’s mother is quite frustrated and concerned that he will become malnourished. Reflective 

Questions

1. What additional assessment information would you collect? 

2. What questions would you ask, and how would you further explore this issue with the mother? 

3. In what ways does the distance of the extended family influence this family’s approach to health promotion? 

4. What factors would you consider to determine whether malnourishment is a factor in this family?

Requesting writing tutor

/in /by

HED

HED

In the article The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity [PDF], the authors focus on the need for health equity in the U.S. and the World through:

Identification of Disparities

Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Disparities

Investing in Equity Measurement

Incentivizing the Achievement of Equity

In 250 to 300 words discuss the addition of health equity to complete the Quintuple Aim and outline how you will integrate the recommendations to achieve health equity into the organization if you were the CEO.

HEALTH ASSESSMENT

/in /by

Module 06 Classroom Assignment – Assess and Document

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Module 06 Content

1.

Top of Form

Conduct an assessment of the following body system: 

· Skin-comprehensive assessment

You may conduct the assessment on a fellow student, friend, or family member. Remember to secure their permission.

Use the worksheet provided in class & Collect both subjective and objective data using the process described in the textbook. Review the Evolve resources & video on Skin located in the Overview tab under Module 6

Write a summary of the assessment and the skills utilized. See the questions below to guide you. Do not disclose any patient identifiers. 

1. What skills (assessment techniques) were utilized during the assessment?

1. What subjective data did you collect? (list your findings)

1. What objective data did you collect? (list your findings

 
APA format isn't required. 

Nursing

/in /by

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to investigate informatics in healthcare and to apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to its appropriate use in healthcare technology.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision‐making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in the delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 200 points

Preparing the assignment

Your faculty member will provide a scenario for you to address in your paper. Choose an ending to the scenario, and construct your paper based on those reflections. Choose one of the following outcomes for the end of the scenario:

1. A HIPAA violation occurs, and client data is exposed to the media.

2. A medication error has harmed a client.

3. A technology downtime that impacts patient care occurs, and an error is made.

4. A ransomware attack has occurred, and the organization must contemplate paying the ransom or lose access to patient data.

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Include the following sections:

a. Introduction – 20 points/10%

· Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

· Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

· Offers a compelling argument to elicit the readers attention and generate interest.

b. HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion – 20 points/10%

· Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

c. Scenario Ending and Recommendations – 50 points/25%

· Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

· Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

· Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

· Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

d. Advantages and Disadvantages – 50 points/25%

· Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

· Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

e. Conclusion and Reflections – 40 points/20%

· Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

· Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

· Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

· Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

f. APA Style and Organization – 20 points/10%

· References are submitted with assignment.

· Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

· Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

· Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

· At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

· A scenario is to be used to complete the RUA: We Can But Dare We paper that is due at the end of week 4. Below is the scenario; please do not use any other scenario for this assignment. Logistics and details, including scenario ending choices, regarding the paper can be found in the RUA: We Can But Dare We grading rubric found in the Unit 4 module.

Scenario:

You are an emergency department nurse responding to a severe freeway accident. As a triage registered nurse determining the severity of each case and maintaining proper flow, it is your duty to review all patients impacted by this event. While reviewing patients coming in, you stumble across a familiar name, which happens to be the name of a famous actor, Governor Gru. Upon determining this, you happen to take a photo of the data and post about the finding on your social media account.

To complete this paper, please choose an appropriate scenario ending listed in the RUA We Can But Dare We rubric (which is also attached to this announcement).

 

THIS IS AN INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT. Each of you will write your own paper.

This assignment will be submitted to Turn It In and will be screened for integrity violations. TRY NOT use quotes of any kind. (1 is acceptable). If you paraphrase and cite all content you will significantly reduce your similarity score.

 FOLLOW THE RUBRIC to receive full points! 

Please reach out to your assigned faculty member with questions!


NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare

We Can, But Dare We? Guidelines

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 1

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Section not present

Introduction

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

2. Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

3. Offers a compelling argument to elicit the reader’s attention and generate interest.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

2. Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

3. Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Scenario Ending and Recommendations

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

2. Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

3. Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

4. Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Advantages and Disadvantages

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

2. Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

3. Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

4. Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Conclusion and Reflections

(40 points/20%)

40 points

34 points

30 points

15 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

2. Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

3. Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

4. Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

APA Style and Organization

(20 points/10%)

20 points

18 points

16 points

8 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. References are submitted with assignment.

2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

4. Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

5. At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

Includes all requirements for section.

Includes 4 requirements for section.

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 1-2 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Total Points Possible = 200 points

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 4

image1.png

informatics

/in /by

As you learned from the chapter, reading, and video lectures, the cost of health care is a major concern in the US. As we discussed, value-based models promise to bend the cost curve in the right direction. The article you read by Erickson et al (2020) is mostly from the point of view of physicians so it is always a good idea to think critically about articles like this. Do you think that the authors present solid arguments in favor of what they propose? Do you think their point of view is similar to what you read and think about ways to decrease costs while increasing quality? Do you think that their point of view considers other health care-related professions?

Nursing Health Care Reform Assignment

/in /by

Please take a look at the attachment

SOAP note

/in /by

Insomnia

Journal

/in /by

 Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next class

Clinical Decision Making Discussion

/in /by

Purpose

The purpose of this interactive discussion is to allow for a discovery of the clinical decision-making process that guides the appropriate clinical use of pharmacologic agents used in the treatment of acute disorders across the adult lifespan. The development of evidence-based prescribing practice supports the professional formation of the AGACNP practice role.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  1. Summarize the clinical utilization of pharmaceutical agents for specific diseases with rationale. (COs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6)
  2. Evaluate alternative perspectives on clinical management of selected diseases with pharmaceutical agents and articulate a substantial rationale that supports further discussion and healthy debate. (COs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6)

Due Date

The initial response to the chosen discussion question is due by Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Subsequent posts, including substantive responses to peer(s) and faculty questions, must occur by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. A total of 3 substantive posts are required on 3 different days.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for initial discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (0 points are earned).

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number of interactive dialogue posts (3) OR not posting on the minimum required number of days (3). NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (0 points are earned).

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 100 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. Answer the question that corresponds with the 1st letter of your last name only, do not respond to any other questions in your initial post (see table below).
  2. Post your initial response to the discussion question by the due date.
  3. Post substantial replies to peer and faculty by the due date.
  4. Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion.

If your name begins with the letters…

Answer this question…

A-G

You are working in the Emergency Department and a 20-year-old female with history of intravenous drug abuse presents with concern of septic shock. What are the considerations in choosing the appropriate antibiotic for this patient? Explain your thought process, questions you would need to ask, and what antibiotic you would order, and when.

H-M

How does the empiric pharmacological therapy differ in a patient with healthcare-associated meningitis (such as a neurosurgical patient with an external ventricular drain) as compared to a healthy adult with community-acquired bacterial meningitis? Explain your rationale.

N-S

You are admitting a 78-year-old male smoker with hx of asthma into the intensive care unit for a diagnosis of hospital acquired pneumonia. He was admitted three weeks ago with pneumonia and discharged to home on azithromycin after a 2-day hospitalization. What antimicrobial treatment will you order on his ICU admission now? Explain your rationale.

T-Z

What would be the alternative empiric pharmacological therapy for a 50-year-old male with a history of anaphylaxis to cephalosporins? Explain your rationale.

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. 

Last name initial is P.

References can’t be no more than 5 years old, unless it’s a recent CPG.

Types of Shock

/in /by

It is very important to differentiate between the different types of shock since treatment may depend on this. Complete the Comparison Table on the different types of shock.