Nursing CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING THE HEAD, EYES, EARS, NOSE, AND THROAT

Episodic/Focused SOAP Note Template

 

Patient Information:

Initials, Age, Sex, Race


S.

CC (chief complaint) a BRIEF statement identifying why the patient is here – in the patient’s own words – for instance “headache”, NOT “bad headache for 3 days”.

HPI: This is the symptom analysis section of your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis. Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. Use LOCATES Mnemonic to complete your HPI. You need to start EVERY HPI with age, race, and gender (e.g., 34-year-old AA male). You must include the seven attributes of each principal symptom in paragraph form not a list. If the CC was “headache”, the LOCATES for the HPI might look like the following example:

Location: head

Onset: 3 days ago

Character: pounding, pressure around the eyes and temples

Associated signs and symptoms: nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia

Timing: after being on the computer all day at work

Exacerbating/ relieving factors: light bothers eyes, Aleve makes it tolerable but not completely better

Severity: 7/10 pain scale

Current Medications: include dosage, frequency, length of time used and reason for use; also include OTC or homeopathic products.

Allergies: include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately (a description of what the allergy is ie angioedema, anaphylaxis, etc. This will help determine a true reaction vs intolerance).

PMHx: include immunization status (note date of
last tetanus for all adults), past major illnesses and surgeries. Depending on the CC, more info is sometimes needed

Soc Hx: include occupation and major hobbies, family status, tobacco & alcohol use (previous and current use), any other pertinent data. Always add some health promo question here – such as whether they use seat belts all the time or whether they have working smoke detectors in the house, living environment, text/cell phone use while driving, and support system.

Fam Hx: illnesses with possible genetic predisposition, contagious or chronic illnesses. Reason for death of any deceased first degree relatives should be included. Include parents, grandparents, siblings, and children. Include grandchildren if pertinent.

ROS: cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis You should list each system as follows:
General:
Head:
EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL:  Denies weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or fatigue.

HEENT:  Eyes: Denies visual loss, blurred vision, double vision or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat:  Denies hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat.

SKIN:  Denies rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR:  Denies chest pain, chest pressure or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY:  Denies shortness of breath, cough or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL:  Denies anorexia, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY:  Burning on urination. Pregnancy. Last menstrual period, MM/DD/YYYY.

NEUROLOGICAL:  Denies headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL:  Denies muscle, back pain, joint pain or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC:  Denies anemia, bleeding or bruising.

LYMPHATICS:  Denies enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

PSYCHIATRIC:  Denies history of depression or anxiety.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC:  Denies reports of sweating, cold or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

ALLERGIES:  Denies history of asthma, hives, eczema or rhinitis.


O.

Physical exam: From head-to-toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History.
Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see. Always document in head to toe format i.e. General: Head: EENT: etc.

Diagnostic results: Include any labs, x-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines)


A

.

Differential Diagnoses (list a minimum of 3 differential diagnoses).Your primary or presumptive diagnosis should be at the top of the list. For each diagnosis, provide supportive documentation with evidence based guidelines.


P.
  

This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.

References

You are required to include at least three evidence based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced based guidelines which relates to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

© 2021 Walden University, LLC

Page 1 of 3

WEEK 8 RN EBP POST REPLY

Reflection on The Evidence-Nursing Practice Connection

Discussion reply

Hello class!

Good Morning,

One barrier that keeps nurses from engaging in evidence-based-practice is a lack of knowledge and understanding in the practice. Most of the time nurses work a unit and become familiar with that unit and most unit are broken up based on body system affected. Working in mental health I would be nervous getting pulled to another unit because it is not what I am used to. Yes, while in nursing school we learn all the systems but once you find what you like, you try to stick with that field. One strategy you could use to facilitate the use of evidence-based practice is to encourage to use of a mentor program especially for new nursing graduates.  Mentoring or just having a supportive environment makes learning and using evidence much easier.

During the beginning of this course, I didn’t really think about evidence-based practice, it was just something we as nurses used. I learned the importance of evidence-based research and how it improves nursing practices.  Learning how to correctly present an issue and suggested steps to improve this issue and how it would affect patients and staff. That was the most helpful I even presented an issue to my supervisor, and it was forwarded to the director, So now I just need to complete the presentation to the Leadership committee next week. Hopefully it goes well. But still nervous!

( Jennifer)

Reference:

Ginex, P. K. (2023, August 18). Overcome barriers to applying an evidence-based process for practice change. ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/overcome-barriers-to-applying-an-evidence-based-process-for-practice-change#:~:text=Barriers%20to%20EBP%20Change&text=Lack%20of%20time%20is%20often,the%20clinical%20problem%20being%20addressed.

Bvorel. (2023, March 16). Nurses implement evidence-based practice. EMU Online. https://online.emich.edu/degrees/healthcare/rn-to-bsn/nurses-implement-evidence-based-practice/

Nursing Assignment-1 4040

Assessment 1

Nursing Informatics in Health Care

INSTRUCTION- Write a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the need for a nurse informaticist in an organization who would focus on improving health care outcomes.

Introduction- Nurses at the baccalaureate level in all practice areas are involved in nursing informatics through interaction with information management and patient care technologies. Nurses must not only demonstrate knowledge of and skills in health information and patient care technologies, but also how to use these tools at the bedside and organizational levels. Moreover, nurses need to recognize how information gathered from various health information sources can impact decision making at the national and state regulatory levels.

Preparation- To successfully prepare for this assessment, you will need to complete these preparatory activities:

· Review assessment resources and activities.

· Conduct independent research on the nursing knowledge and skills necessary to interact with health information and patient care technology.

· Focus your research on current resources available through peer-reviewed articles, professional websites, government websites, professional blogs, wikis, job boards, and so on.

· Consult the 

BSN Program Library Research Guide
 for help in identifying scholarly and authoritative sources.

· Interview peers in your network who are considered information technology experts.

· Ask them about how information technology advances are impacting patient care at the bedside, at the organizational level, and beyond.

Scenario- For this assessment, assume you are a nurse attending a meeting of your state’s nurses association. A nurse informaticist conducted a presentation on her role and its impact on positive patient and organizational outcomes in her workplace. You realize that your organization is undergoing many technological changes. You believe this type of role could provide many benefits to your organization.

You decide to pursue proposing a nurse informaticist role in your organization. You speak to your chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager, who ask you to prepare a 4–5 page evidence-based proposal to support the new role. In this way, they can make an informed decision as to whether the addition of such a role could justify the return on investment (ROI). They need your proposal before an upcoming fiscal meeting.​ This is not an essay, but instead, it is a proposal to create a new Nurse Informaticist position.

One important part of this assessment is the justification of the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization and references from relevant and timely scholarly or professional resources to support the justification for creating this nurse informaticist position. The term justify means to show or prove that the nurse informaticist position brings value to the organization. This justification must include evidence from the literature to support that this position will provide a return on investment for the organization.

Proposal Format- The chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager have asked you to include the following headings in your 
proposal and to be sure to address the bullets following each heading:

Nursing Informatics and the Nurse Informaticist

· What is nursing informatics?

· What is the role of the nurse informaticist?

Nurse Informaticists and Other Health Care Organizations

· What is the experience of other health care organizations with nurse informaticists?

· How do these nurse informaticists interact with the rest of the nursing staff and the interdisciplinary team?

Impact of Full Nurse Engagement in Health Care Technology

· How does fully engaging nurses in health care technology impact:

· Patient care?

· Protected health information (security, privacy, and confidentiality)?

· In this section, you will explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients' protected health information, particularly privacy, security, and confidentiality. Evidence-based means that they are supported by evidence from scholarly sources.

· Workflow?

· Costs and return on investment?

Opportunities and Challenges

· What are the opportunities and challenges for nurses and the interdisciplinary team with the addition of a nurse informaticist role?

· How can the 
interdisciplinary team collaborate to improve quality care outcomes through technology?

Summary of Recommendations

· What are 3–4 key takeaways from your 
proposal about the recommended nurse informaticist role that you want the CNO and the HR manager to remember?

· This is the section where the justification for the implementation of the nursing informaticist role is addressed. Remember to include evidence from the literature to support your recommendation.

·
Additional Requirements-
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

·
Submission length: 4–5 double-spaced pages, in addition to title and references pages.

·
Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.

·
Citations and References: Cite a 
minimum of three current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your ideas. In addition, cite a 
minimum of one current professional blog or website to support your central ideas. 
Current means no more than five years old.

·
APA formatting: Be sure to follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references. For an APA refresher, consult the 

Evidence and APA
 page on Campus.

Competencies Measured- By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Describe nurses' and the interdisciplinary team's role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

· Define nursing informatics and the role of the nurse informaticist.

· Explain how the nurse collaborates with the interdisciplinary team, including technologists, to improve the quality of patient care.

· Justify the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization.

· Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.

· Explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients’ protected health information (privacy, security, and confidentiality).

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

· Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

· Create a clear, well-organized, and professional proposal that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated

Nursing Informatics in Health Care Scoring Guide

CRITERIA

NON-PERFORMANCE

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

Define nursing informatics and the role of the nurse informaticist.

Explain how the nurse informaticist collaborates with the interdisciplinary team, including technologists, to improve the quality of patient care.

Justify the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization.

Explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients’ protected health information (privacy, security, and confidentiality).

Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Create a clear, well-organized, and professional proposal that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.







INVESTIGATING A CRITICAL PRACTICE QUESTION THROUGH A LITERATURE REVIEW

Complete Parts 1 and 2 of your Assignment:

  • Part 1: Literature Review: Be sure you have completed all required sections of the template (PDF) document.(attached below)
  • Part 2: Critical Assessment p aper: look at the rubric for instructions. keep in mind to also Apply feedback of value to you in completing your synthesis of evidence to inform a practice change initiative focusing on quality improvement

RUBRIC:- The Assignment: Part 1: Literature Review of at least 10 scholarly articles:• Using the Walden university Library as your source, search to select at least 10 scholarly articles that represent current literature (i.e., published within the previous 5 years) with evidence that addresses your critical question (I will send you the critical question) and could inform a practice change initiative for quality improvement. Using the Individual -Evidence Summary/Synthesis Tool template document, complete all sections for each article.

-The Assignment: Part 2: (example attached below) Critical Assessment In a p a per of at least 7 pages, plus cover page and references page, include the following:• Write a critical assessment of your search outcomes that synthesizes the evidence from your literature review.

-Demonstrate clear connections between the practice problem that informs your critical question, your appraisal of evidence that addresses the critical question, and resulting clarification on the need for a practice change initiative focusing on quality improvement. Be specific and provide examples.

-Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph/Sentence StructureParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

-Written Expression and Formatting: The assignment contains parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 10 evidence-based references are listed.

WK 1 discussion post Reply

Please see attachment for instructions. 

wk7691B

1

Week 7: Change Project Final Paper

Your final paper will encompass all assignments you have completed thus far. At this

point, you will have submitted each section individually and a comprehensive rough

draft. You have received extensive feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous

assignment feedback should be evident. 


The paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,

references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and

format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.

The final paper should be professionally written in a manner suitable for publication.

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based

Change Project Paper Rubic (Final))

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper

Rubic (Final))

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background

15 to >12.3 pts

Meets Expectations

The change project topic is introduced. All

background information is included. Project

importance within the field or significance for

the designated facility is described.

15 pts

2

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format

15 to >12.3 pts

Meets Expectations

Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the

chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem

thoroughly, including the target population

description and history/background information

at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance

and applicability to nursing is included and well

presented. Includes an appropriate topic

identification related to an advanced practice

nursing issue or practice problem of concern.

Population is fully defined and present in the

research question. Includes specific

interventions, identifies comparisons, and

presents appropriate outcomes in a timely

manner for the question. Overall, the question is

well-built using the PICOT format.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review

18 to >14.76 pts

Meets Expectations

The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed

articles, books, or limited non-research literature

(tool kits or standardized procedures) are

present. Literature is supported by scientific

evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics

are used to support the main topic. In-text

citations are present and correctly formatted.

Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of

significant findings related to the change project

topic. Ideas are synthesized and professionally

sound and creative. Insightful and

comprehensive conclusions and solutions are

present.

18 pts

3

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes

18 to >14.76 pts

Meets Expectations

The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes

are well-developed. They are clear and thorough.

Aims include examples of projected features and

functions. Values include implementation

benefits for specific stakeholders. Desired

outcomes state the purpose, have a quality

focus, and describe the benefits that will occur

as a result of implementation.

18 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework

18 to >14.76 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies independent theories or conceptual

models that relate to the change project topic

and describes how they will be applied to the

change project. Thoroughly discusses how each

element of the phenomenon applies to the

framework. Clearly applies each element of the

theory to the elements of the phenomenon

under study. Develops the rationale for the

sample selection criteria, and expertly discusses,

analyzes, and critiques pertinent research that

uses the framework.

18 pts

4

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention

18 to >14.76 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides keen insight into obstacles and

proposes sound, creative solutions or

interventions based on the literature review

findings. Expertly compares other views on the

problem and solutions with detail. Uses

examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in

the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its

significance to the nursing profession and filling

gaps in knowledge. Accurately categorizes and

thoroughly explains specific methods of data

collection to be used. Explains in detail how data

will be analyzed and used. Provides a sound

justification for subject selection and sampling

procedure. Accurately and thoroughly describes

potential limitations to data collection and

control.

18 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion

18 to >14.76 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an insightful and thorough summary of

the project, main points, and details the

significance of the project to the advanced

practice nursing profession. Provides detailed

and creative recommendations for future

research and implications for clinical practice.

Discusses limitations of the study in detail.

Suggests specific directions for future research.

Insightfully considers changes in theoretical

construct and provides reasonable and creative

suggestions for public policy and/or changes in

educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical

framework to the overall product.

18 pts

5

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA

30 to >24.6 pts

Meets Expectations

Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.

Information is well organized and clearly

communicated. The assignment is free of spelling

and grammatical errors. All the requirements

related to format, length, source citations, and

layout are followed. A complete reference page is

included and formatted using correct APA format. If

applicable, appendices and tables are complete and

appropriate.

30 pts

Total Points: 150

  • Week 7: Change Project Final Paper

OFF-LABEL DRUG USE IN PEDIATRICS

Please see attached.

Nursing Assignment

Week 3 assignments

If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?

 If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided? 

50S

Introduction

This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.

Preparation

You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of 

Healthy People 2030
.

Instructions

Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.

For this assessment:

· Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.

Document Format and Length

Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

Supporting Evidence

Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

· Address three health care issues.

· Design an intervention for each health issue.

· Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

· Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

· Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.

· Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

· Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

· Cite specific health policy provisions.

· Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

· Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.

· Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.

· Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Additional Requirements

Before submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.

Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your 
ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.

Context

Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.