NUR640 Week 1 Assignment 1.2 Page 1

`

Assignment Title: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO)

Step 1 for your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project (Research Proposal)

Assignment Overview:

For your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project Step 1, you will submit your PICO question, identify 5 research articles from Levels of Evidence I-V, and write the following for your Mini-Research Proposal: Your introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, your Research Question, and which theory supports your Mini-Research Proposal.

Deliverables:

The final copy of your Step1 Mini-Research Proposal assignment is due on or before Sunday at 11:59pm just before Week 2 begins, at the latest. Be sure to use the file naming protocol: NUR640_EBP Step 1_last name_mmddyyyy.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will write part of Section 1 of your Mini-Research Proposal. Use the discernment gained from your Week 1 Discussion of identifying a problem or area of interest and writing a PICO question as a basis for beginning your Section 1. Review Chapter 2 (Manuscript Structure and Content) and Chapter 3 (Writing Clearly and Concisely) from the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Note, you will submit a 2-3 page paper plus your Title Page and Reference Page that clearly identifies the following areas:

1) PICO Question;

2) 5 Research articles with Levels of Evidence of I-IV;

3) Your introduction, problem statement, purpose statement, and significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, along with the theory undergirding your PICO and Problem statement.

PICO Question: Describe the Problem/Population (P); Your Intervention (I); your Comparison (C), and Outcomes (O).

Research Articles (5) between I-IV Levels of Evidence with APA reference citation. Identify the level of evidence of each article after the reference citation that goes at the end of this Assignment submission.

Introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, and Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal. Your
problem statement provides an overview of your Mini-Research Proposal topic and a clear statement of the need for this Mini-Research Proposal topic. The 5 articles that you have selected should provide rationale for the need for this Mini-Research Proposal. Your
purpose statement justifies the need for your Mini-Research Proposal and is supported in the literature. The
significance of your Mini-Research Proposal is clearly stated and supported by the literature. The
research question is clearly presented. Your selected
theory may be based on pathophysiology, a nurse theory, or from any health-related discipline.

Note: Your Step 1 of the Mini-Research Proposal should have an introduction and summary of what you have written.

Grading: Each part of your Mini-Research Proposal has a grading rubric. All submissions should have a title page and reference page. Each Section of the Mini-Research Proposal will then be added together the Week 5 assignment, which will be graded again with a new rubric that includes your best revision based on detailed weekly instructor feedback. Points will be lost if suggestions are not incorporated into the final Week 5 Submission of your Mini-Research Proposal. (See Week 5 Assignment rubric).

image1.png

image2.jpeg

Reflection on Leadership Self-Assessment

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this reflection is for learners to review leadership skills and assess their readiness for leadership in the future.

Preparing the Assignment

· Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:

· Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

· Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

· Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

· Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

· Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection

· Best Practices include:

· Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

· Enter the reflection often during the week to read and learn from posts.

· Select different classmates for your reply each week.

 Reflection Question

Based on the results you obtained from the Foundation of Nursing Leadership self-assessment in Week 1 Lesson, reflect on the questions below and share in a post.

· What is your current leadership style?

· How does your leadership style impact your decision making in nursing care?

· How will you further develop your leadership skills?

EBOOK used: Leadership and Management for Nurses

https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780134899510/epubcfi/6/2%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover%5D!/4/2%4093:45

or email:
[email protected]

PWD: Leroyismyhero1#

 

Discussion nursing assigment 

Screening is the administration of measures or tests to distinguish individuals who may have a condition from those who probably do not have it.  Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of screening.  

  Word limit 500 words 

 provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) 

Many organizations provide educational materials about osteoporosis, physical activity, and other topics pertinent to health promotion for musculoskeletal wellness. Some materials are available in Spanish and other languages, and many of these materials are free.

From the list below select on organization and an intervention that you could implement in your current place of work to promote health development of your patient/client population. State reasons why and the EBP behind your selection.

America on the Move Foundation

https://aom3.americaonthemove.org

American Cancer Society

www/cancer.org

American Heart Association

www.heart.org

Arthritis Foundation

www.arthritis.org

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

www.niams.nih.gov

National Cancer Institute

www.cancer.gov

National Osteoporosis Foundation

www.nof.org

Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 250 words, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.

Introduction and quality of discussion’s Argument

60% of total result

Objectivity of Tone, overall quality & Review of Literature in APA 6th format within past 7 years

10% of total result

Grammar / Writing Skills

7% of total result