Nursing LAB ASSIGNMENT: ETHICAL CONCERNS question
please see attached
please see attached
create a SOAP note with information below
Create – objectives to understand assessment and treatment of COPD
Add 3 APA style sources no older than 5 years
Assignment topic for Communication:
Under the communication topic is the idea of advanced directives. The advance directive idea has grown from basic forms that can be found in the state statutes to very refined documents such as Five Wishes or POLST or MOLST. But to start this topic we can access the Florida State statutes and see what the State of Florida has to offer as a advance directive. Here is the direct link to the Florida State Statute 765.101 https://www.caringinfo.org/planning/advance-directives/by-state/florida/
Scroll down to “Download Florida Advance Directive” This will give you an idea about the contents of the standard State form using the Florida one as an example. If you list the main parts it will give you an idea about the types of choices these forms allow for which are not exactly detailed or extensive in content. Now if you were to open a Five Wishes form: https://www.fivewishes.org/five-wishes-sample.pdf
Links to an external site. and compare to the earlier State form it becomes obvious the difference.
As a variation on the same theme there is also the POLST form which also gives several choices as a type of advance directive form. This will be our discussion for the communication module.
Assignment: Compare the two methods of Advanced Directives, that is the State of Florida form with either the Five Wishes or the POLST form and describe the following:
a) What are the differences between the forms?
b) Why do you think that there are differences between the forms?
c) What is accomplished by the newer generation of advanced directive (eg. Five Wishes or POLST)?
d) Which form would you rather have as a patient? and why?
Your answer should be at least 300 words and have a reference to it. You should comply with APA 7th ed guidelines and answer all of the questions clearly and completely.
The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a community assessment in a form of an interview and physical appraisal of the community.
To Prepare:
· Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
· Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
· Describe the project you propose.
· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4
Submit your completed Project Proposal.
HED
HED
In the article The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity [PDF], the authors focus on the need for health equity in the U.S. and the World through:
Identification of Disparities
Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Disparities
Investing in Equity Measurement
Incentivizing the Achievement of Equity
In 250 to 300 words discuss the addition of health equity to complete the Quintuple Aim and outline how you will integrate the recommendations to achieve health equity into the organization if you were the CEO.
Discussion Topic
Top of Form
This week our readings took us into Specific Aspects of Health Promotion for the following conditions: Weight Management and Digestive Wellness, Cardiovascular Wellness, and Respiratory Wellness.
Imagine you are leading a focus group which is implementing one of the nursing interventions learned for a specific health problem.
Having you as a moderator of a community focus group that will explore knowledge, believes, attitudes and behaviors about your selected health problem [you may select any health problem]:
1.
Define your group and the setting for the activity, applying statistical principles of sample size and homogeneity.
2.
Create and share an opening question to explore perceptions of the health risks associated with your topic of interest.
3.
Create a question that should explore beliefs and perceptions about external influences related to your selected topic.
4.
Create a third question that will help you in understanding the perception (in group members) of roles towards improving the health problem.
Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359.
Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.
As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 250 words, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.
Bottom of Form
Unit 9 ADHD Medications. 800w. 4 references. Due 10-26-23
Thomas Deliver, a 36-year-old male patient, enters your office for his initial appointment. According to the intake paperwork, Mr. Deliver is a computer programmer who is complaining of problems with concentration, completing tasks, and being terrible at listening during company meetings and even at home. He explains that he has difficulty starting and completing work projects and trouble being on time or keeping appointments and commitments. He has divorced 3 months ago and has joint custody of two daughters ages 6 and 10 years old. On most days, he sleeps late and he has trouble keeping a regular schedule and getting his children to their lessons and extracurricular appointments on time.
Mr. Deliver believes the lack of concentration and poor communication with his wife led to the divorce, and Mr. Deliver worries that his trouble with organization and attention may affect his custody agreement and prevent him from keeping his job.
Mr. Deliver’s employer and his family and friends have suggested to him that he should get evaluated for ADHD, but he has resisted because of concerns about the stigma of a psychiatric diagnosis and the risks of taking a psychotropic medication.
Mr. Deliver is 5'11″ and his weight is 165 lb. He takes a men’s multivitamin daily, HCTZ at 25 mg for hypertension, fish oil 1,000 mg at bedtime for hyperlipidemia, and a rescue inhaler that he keeps with him although he hasn’t had to use it for many years.
1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?
2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?
Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver
meets the criteria for ADHD?
The first tool I would use to affirm that this patient meets the criteria for ADHD would be
the DSM-5. The DSM-5 lists the diagnostic criteria for ADHD as needing six or more of
the symptoms in either category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and
impulsivity) that last for at least 6 months and to a degree that negatively impacts social,
academic or occupations activities. These symptoms also need to be present in two or
more settings, be present prior to age of 12 years and do not occur exclusively during
the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder and are not better explained
by another mental disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). There are also
many screening tools to use in addition to the DSM-5. Rating scales are used in
conjunction with the DSM-5 to help with diagnosis of ADHD. Rating scales specifically
designed for use in adults include: Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom
Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS); Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS);
ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV); and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).
This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/
2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD,
inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological
treatment for Mr. Deliver?
I would recommend either an amphetamine or methylphenidate. I am slightly
concerned about this patient’s history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, as both
of these psychostimulant classes have been shown to raise blood pressure. Long
term studies have shown that stimulant use is not associated with increased risk of
heart attacks, cardiac death or stroke. Those with well-controlled hypertension have
been shown to manage ADHD symptoms effectively with amphetamines and
methylphenidates. This still does not negate the fact however, that the product
labels of stimulants state that “caution is indicated” when treating patients with preexisting hypertension (Fairman et al., 2018). I would also be sure to encourage this
patient to partake in behavioral therapy as well as using prescription medication.
3. Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male
that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on
any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?
For an adolescent patient the treatment plan is not a lot different than for adults
with ADHD. Stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, but there can be a
risk for growth restriction. There are other non-stimulant medications that could be
tried first (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). As with
adults with ADHD, I would also recommend concurrent behavioral therapy (Heldt,
2017).
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing
Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of
Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD
with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real
World Outcomes, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2
This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry
(Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44–53.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/
Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing
Platform
1.What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?
The DSM-5 would be the first resource I would consult to confirm if this patient satisfies the requirements for ADHD. According to the DSM-5, six or more symptoms from either group—category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and impulsivity)—must be present for at least six months and have a detrimental influence on a person's ability to engage in social, academic, or occupational activities. Additionally, these symptoms must appear in two or more contexts, appear before the age of twelve, not only occasionally during the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic condition, and not be better explained by another mental illness (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).The DSM-5 is just one of several screening instruments available. The DSM-5 and rating scales are combined to assist in the diagnosis of ADHD. The Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS), the Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS), the ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV), and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) are among the rating scales created expressly for use in adults (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).
2.Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?
Either an amphetamine or methylphenidate is what I would advise. The patient's history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia causes me a little anxiety because it has been demonstrated that both of these kinds of psychostimulants can increase blood pressure. Studies conducted over an extended period of time have revealed no link between stimulant usage and an increased risk of heart attacks, cardiac death, or stroke. Amphetamines and methylphenidate have been demonstrated to help people with well-controlled hypertension manage their ADHD symptoms. However, this does not change the fact that while treating patients with preexisting hypertension, caution is advised on the product labels of stimulants (Fairman et al., 2018). In addition to prescription medication, I would make sure to encourage this patient to engage in behavioral treatment.
3.Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?
The treatment strategy is mostly the same for adolescents and adults with ADHD. Although stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, there is a chance that they may limit growth. There are more non-stimulant drugs that might be tried initially (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). In the same way that I would advise concurrent behavioral therapy for people with ADHD (Heldt, 2017)
Step-by-step explanation
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing
Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real World Outcomes, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/
Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
See attachment for instructions
1
This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your
previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If
you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next
writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write
about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If
you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One
week for this job.
Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your
previous writings.
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787
https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933
Week 4: Change Project Rough Draft
2
This week, you will bring together all of the assignments you have completed thus far,
and compose the rough draft of your change project paper. At this point, you will have
submitted each section and received feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident.
Your rough draft contains all of the expected
components of the final draft and is presented in APA format including a cover page,
references, and appendices when warranted. Your rough draft is your opportunity to
polish previously submitted assignments and combine the sections in a comprehensive
paper that show your change project is ready to be implemented.
You will take this time to identify and address any weaknesses or gaps in your change
project. Your rough draft should only require minor revisions before the final paper.
Your paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,
references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and
format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (rough draft)
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper
Rubic (rough draft)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
The change project topic is introduced. All
background information is included. Project
importance within the field or significance
for the designated facility is described.
3.5
pts
3
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the
chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem
thoroughly, including the target population
description and history/background information
at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance
and applicability to nursing is included and well
presented. Includes an appropriate topic
identification related to an advanced practice
nursing issue or practice problem of concern.
Population is fully defined and present in the
research question. Includes specific interventions,
identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate
outcomes in a timely manner for the question.
Overall, the question is well-built using the PICOT
format.
3.5
pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review
3.5 to >2.87 pts
Meets Expectations
The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed
articles, books, or limited non-research literature
(tool kits or standardized procedures) are present.
Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is
credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support
the main topic. In-text citations are present and
correctly formatted. Presents a thorough and
insightful analysis of significant findings related to
the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and
professionally sound and creative. Insightful and
comprehensive conclusions and solutions are
present.
3.5
pts
4
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes are
well-developed. They are clear and thorough. Aims
include examples of projected features and
functions. Values include implementation benefits
for specific stakeholders. Desired outcomes state the
purpose, have a quality focus, and describe the
benefits that will occur as a result of
implementation.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual models
that relate to the change project topic and describes
how they will be applied to the change project.
Thoroughly discusses how each element of the
phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly
applies each element of the theory to the elements
of the phenomenon under study. Develops the
rationale for the sample selection criteria, and
expertly discusses, analyzes, and critiques pertinent
research that uses the framework.
7 pts
5
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention
7 to >5.74 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides keen insight into obstacles and proposes
sound, creative solutions or interventions based on
the literature review findings. Expertly compares
other views on the problem and solutions with detail.
Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in
the intervention and discusses implications for
clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the
implications of the change project and its significance
to the nursing profession and filling gaps in
knowledge. Accurately categorizes and thoroughly
explains specific methods of data collection to be
used. Explains in detail how data will be analyzed and
used. Provides a sound justification for subject
selection and sampling procedure. Accurately and
thoroughly describes potential limitations to data
collection and control.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion
10.5 to >8.61 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides an insightful and thorough summary of the
project, main points, and details the significance of
the project to the advanced practice nursing
profession. Provides detailed and creative
recommendations for future research and
implications for clinical practice. Discusses limitations
of the study in detail. Suggests specific directions for
future research. Insightfully considers changes in
theoretical construct and provides reasonable and
creative suggestions for public policy and/or changes
in educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical
framework to the overall product.
10.5
pts
6
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Rough
Draft
17.5 to >14.35 pts
Meets Expectations
Submission shows a concerted effort to present a
high-quality draft requiring minimal adjustments to
content and mechanics. All parts of the research
paper are submitted and efforts to integrate
feedback are highly apparent. Significant and
substantive improvements have been made to each
section of the paper.
17.5
pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA
10.5 to >8.61 pts
Meets Expectations
Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.
Information is well organized and clearly
communicated. The assignment is free of spelling and
grammatical errors. All the requirements related to
format, length, source citations, and layout are
followed. A complete reference page is included and
formatted using correct APA format. If applicable,
appendices and tables are complete and
appropriate.The
10.5
pts
Total Points: 70
7
Submitmyhomework.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations. It can be used for generating new ideas and thoughts for your own project, additional insight into the subject, or encouragement for further researches.

